Connect with us

Education

Dr. Shawn Joseph Unchained

THE TENNESSEE TRIBUNE — As the highly tumultuous period of leadership for the city’s first African-American Director of Schools for Metro Nashville Public Schools comes to a shameful end, Dr. Shawn Joseph showed class all the way while the city will have to watch and see if the Board of Education will claw the new black Director of Schools.

Published

on

By Tribune Staff Writer 

NASHVILLE, TN — As the highly tumultuous period of leadership for the city’s first African-American Director of Schools for Metro Nashville Public Schools comes to a shameful end, Dr. Shawn Joseph showed class all the way while the city will have to watch and see if the Board of Education will claw the new black Director of Schools. The city of Nashville was forced to watch the media and some board members driven by personal agendas viscously attack his more than 20-year career, his name, and his character. With such heavy focus on Dr. Joseph, the priorities and educational concerns for the more than 85,000 school children took a backseat. Non-African American reporters worried about the type of music he liked and how he was being transported to his numerous meetings, but failed to report, discipline or fully expose school board members that invoked Klu Klux Klan behavior by recommending that folks wear masks to a meeting to protest this educated Black man. 

With grace and professionalism, Dr. Joseph faithfully stood by his impressive and proven track record demonstrating gains in math and reading scores, the creation of new STEAM magnet programs at the elementary level and at 18 middle schools and the establishment of an Early College High School program. Like the first Hispanic Director of Schools, Dr. Pedro Garcia, Dr. Joseph had to wade through school board mess left by previous white male superintendents even though those who felt his leadership was questionable failed to realize there were no complaints about Dr. Joseph ever raised by any of the city’s mayors. 

Now that Dr. Joseph can become unchained, he can share his truth. He spoke with The Tennessee Tribune in length and shared insight into several matters of interest to the community providing answers to questions that often went unasked and were severely misreported such as sexual harassment allegations, contracts, that the leaks of confidential information and the infamous request made by a board member encouraging people to come to meetings wearing masks which felt like a modern-day lynching. 

Tennessee Tribune (Tribune): “Dr. Joseph, for your supporters and the many residents of Nashville who care for you and respect your leadership, they want to know how you’re doing?”

Dr. Shawn Joseph (SJ): “I definitely want to thank everyone for the support and prayers. I want them to know that I’m doing fine. Prayer does move things. My name is Joseph, and Joseph, was a mighty person that went through some things and the Lord always took care of him.”

Tribune: “The Tribune also saw that you gave a parting quote from the late artist Tupac.  How should that expression ‘I ain’t mad at cha’ be interpreted by the board and the community?”

SJ:  Prior to that, I was talking about the walk of Jesus, and He teaches us that we have to forgive those that have done us wrong. I wanted the board to know from the bottom of my heart, and genuinely, that I’m not mad at cha.  Things happen as they’re supposed to happen and for times, such as these, it was time to part our ways.”

Tribune: “Do you recall the exact moment when things started to go wrong and you thought things may go in a bad direction?”

SJ:  “What I would say is that I noticed from the time I came to Nashville, I noticed that people aren’t used to strong African-Americans, particularly male leaders and there aren’t that many in Nashville. From the inception, there has been lots of infatuation with how we did the work, why we did the work and things of that nature.  There is also a news group that is also very Jerry Springer-like running around chasing a story and trying to make news when there is no news.”

Tribune: “Are there any job-related moments that caused early shifts in the board members attitudes?”

SJ:  “When we began to discuss equity and putting dollars in schools for the neediest kids and when we started making tough decisions as around budget cuts, a few board members begin to change but the majority understood. We couldn’t stay focused and have the needed communication in order to get through some of the tough decisions.”

Tribune: “Would you say this is when the board began their plans to sabotage and discredit you?”

SJ: “I wouldn’t say it was planned in the beginning but over the last year there have been key individuals who had a mission to destroy my reputation and destroy the great work we were doing in order to keep us off focus. With another year and a half on my contract, I didn’t think the city should sit through another year of fighting.”

Tribune: “What did you think you were going to accomplish in Nashville?”

SJ: “I didn’t come here for that. I came to Nashville to improve reading outcomes for kids and achievements for gifted and talented students, see fewer kids getting suspended, helping kids get certifications, adding early colleges and improve ACT scores among many things. We did these things in a short time frame with a strategic plan to connect the school system to the community. There was a disconnect when I got here, and they never saw the superintendent in the community and the schools. We have to love the children we have and not those that we hope come back.”

Tribune: “You were clear when you said you came here to deal with the children and not the adults. What was in your presentation to the board members at your March 26, 2019 State of Schools meeting?

SJ: “This was at our last board meeting where I communicated that it would be beneficial that we come to a mutual agreement and separate. I also communicated that in the areas where people have continuously tried to say I had done something wrong, I needed to present the facts.”

Tribune: “What were those areas?”

SJ: “I needed to be accurate and clear about sexual harassment, contracts, and other issues that kept coming up. Again, you have these Jerry Springer and Geraldo wanna be newscasters who continuously try to present re-runs. With over 800 meetings in the community, how many times are they going to keep talking about the fact that I have a driver? I’ve never been in a place where people are doing audits of audits.”

Tribune: “What is the final point you want the community to know regarding all of the investigations and allegations?”

SJ: “You can’t make something happen that didn’t happen and it’s clear that nothing illegal, immoral or unethical was done as we were simply trying to do the work. If anything, I pushed too hard and too fast with too little resources.”

Tribune: “What about the mistakes”

SJ: “People make mistakes. Moral mistakes, and it’s not what Shawn did because I was responsible for 11,000 employees and a lot of people in the organization made mistakes. As the superintendent, I’m responsible for what happens. It was on my watch and people worked really hard to connect things to me that weren’t connectable.”

Tribune: “Can you provide an example?”

SJ: “There were two people in Human Resources that didn’t report things to the state.”

Tribune: “Who was the person that was tasked to ensuring the reports were made to the state and to the board and were they terminated?”

SJ: “The person was a human resources employee in Human Relations, and we asked him to resign or be terminated? He resigned.”

Tribune: “So you were stuck holding the bag on infractions that should have been reported to the board?”

SJ:  “Yes, you could say that.”

Tribune: “What did you actually do as a leadership position amidst the sexual harassment claims?”

SJ:  “Unfortunately, bad things happen and the organization must take swift action. The same individual that didn’t turn in paperwork, also had files that contained lots of information and we believe that information was shared with the media and it snowballed into a mess. This was a manufactured crisis that was created.” 

Tribune: “Did any sexual harassment issues really happen?”

SJ: “Clearly there were some issues of sexual harassment that happened and each individual was addressed and the situations thoroughly investigated and evaluated.”

Tribune: “But what about instances directly reported to you?”

SJ: “When an employee came to me directly and communicated a concern, at that exact moment while he talked to me, I sent a message to human resources and he was in the human resources office the next morning getting his information investigated. My responsibility is to report it to human resources and then they follow-up.”

Tribune: “Is there a human resources report or audit in writing on the sexual harassment issues?”

SJ: “There was an audit and the information found there was no substance in the issue after an investigation. However, the report showed different processes but not consistency in the process because people do things different ways. It still goes back to having a news channel and school board members trying to connect you to something with no substance. Just pray for them and hope they understand you don’t do people that way.”

Tribune: “If I’m not mistaken, there’s data that shows you spent less money than your predecessor, Jesse Register?”

SJ: “Yes, we spent millions less. Even with the contract issue, we invested in the right product and our children deserved world class products. These are reasons our reading scores in early grades are growing and ACT scores are up because we put the right investments in the right places to get better outcomes for kids.”

Tribune: “Isn’t this what you were hired for?”

SJ: “The original board hired me because I worked in districts that had gotten better results than Nashville public schools. To make an assertion because I know of a certain product is foolish.”

Tribune: “Was any documentation ever provided to show you the data that lead to their conclusions?”

SJ: “The board received a confidential report from the attorneys, and we were supposed to meet, speak to the lawyers and clarify how they came to their conclusions, but instead, the board sent it to the media before we talked to the law firm and the media reported on it. I had a lot of questions about the report that were broad and dangerous.”

Tribune: “How do you feel about the three board members that gave you all the same unsatisfactory marks on your evaluation?”

SJ: “I think there was definitely inconsistency and definite evidence to suggest these scores were lower than they should be. But the evaluation system was weaponized to do bad things and to blame which would make a system not want to use the evaluation tool. The evaluation system failed because the board wasn’t able to properly evaluate the areas for improvement. We need rubrics so people can’t give a one where it should be a four.”

Tribune: “So basically, all of the evaluations were consistent except three which looked as if they did your evaluation while mad, crying and in the dark?”

SJ: “Those are your words, not mine.”

Tribune: “You presented an attractive budget to the board that included pay raises, money for Pre-K and raises for bus drivers.”

SJ: “The budget was conservative at $31 million considering we only received $5 million last year because we didn’t have money as a city. Student and adult needs were balanced but the board doubled the request asking for 10 percent raises for teachers which is historical. I wouldn’t place the funding for children against adults and now the budget has to be approved by the Mayor and they will have to take the budget they recommend.”

Tribune: “Were the children neglected while so much was being done in this Dr. Joseph witch hunt?”

SJ: “A majority of the board members tried to do the right things. Dr. Sharon Gentry,is an excellent President and Will Pinkston was a strong advocate for the children. Only a few were not focused so the children were not neglected.”

Tribune: “Like cancer, if these board members are not removed what is the difference between you and the new minority leader and so they won’t do this to her?”

SJ: “I don’t know. I hope this board rallies around Dr. Battle so that she can focus on our kids.”

Tribune: “Could the Mayor’s office have provided more support, or did they come too late?”

SJ: “I appreciate David Briley. He cares about the city and about the kids. He’s running for election and you have to be thoughtful about the political environment that you’re in. Ultimately he came out and did the right thing and said we need to focus on our kids.”

Tribune: “What do you think about Vice Mayor Shulman being on the forefront initially and the Mayor didn’t come forth until the heat turned up?

SJ: “I don’t have an opinion on that.”

Tribune: Well, do you have an opinion on what the disadvantaged citizens who don’’t have the platform you do are suppsed to do?

SJ: “This is a moment to become more unchained and begin to be more socially active and use our voices to advocate on behalf of our children and ourselves.”

Tribune: “At one point, two people on the board called you vindictive and tried to get scared teachers to show up like the Ku Klux Klan by hiding their faces in masks?”

SJ: “One of the things that disturbed me the most was the fact the board member referenced masks.” 

Tribune: “In 2019, this is more than wearing a mask because with number 45 in the office this goes straight to the KKK.”

SJ:  “Her lack of humility and sensitivity did not lead her to apologize for the anger and hurt she caused to the community as she shrugged us off like our feelings didn’t matter. This sent a message that we didn’t have a huge outcry from the entire community. 

Tribune: “So in 2019 she basically encourages the cowards to come out with the torches wearing a mask? Anybody that encourages that type of behavior is wrapped in racism.

SJ: “I don’t know because I never imagined having that experience here in Nashville. There’s a way to do things and that definitely wasn’t it.”

Tribune: “If they had shown up in masks and all would you have prayed to Jesus and said forgive me for I know not what they do? Would you have remained calm?”

SJ: “My fraternity taught me, that we’re not afraid. It takes a whole lot to scare Shawn Joseph or make me jump.” 

Tribune: “You know the Bible and like John the Baptist, these people wanted your head on a platter, but they didn’t come to see it cut off.”

SJ:  It’s our job to model civility and show people what right looks like. I am now free to be more outspoken since I’m no longer the superintendent but there is still a God inside of us and we have to model manhood, scholarship and perseverance.”

Tribune: “Seeing a face like yours in the school system in your position gives young black boys goals. When you leave there will be a huge deficit.”

SJ: “I was able to reduce the school suspensions significantly among black males. Kids experience a lot of stress due to disparities and this must continue to be addressed.”

Tribune: “Since you’re no longer the superintendent, what happens when you have to engage with one of the former board members?”

SJ: “I’ll treat them as people and be courteous. These aren’t my friends, so I don’t have to do a lot of talking. The focus is on the kids, always.”

Tribune: “You’re going to, of course, land on your feet. What’s next on the horizon?”

SJ: “I will definitely stay in education. Look for me on April 28th at 1 pm on WQQK-FM 92.1 radio station. I’m finalizing some things and hope to give updates on where I am in my thinking. I will continue to be an advocate for schools, families and parents.”

Dr. Shawn Joseph wishes everyone in Nashville well. He has plans to continue helping the kids of Nashville become future leaders and changemakers. He looks forward to staying in touch on numerous social media platforms and can be reached on Twitter @UnchainedJoseph.

Editor’s Note: Tribune readers may also learn more about the progress of supporting children in Nashville by following these social media sites as well: Facebook @supportnashvillechildren; Twitter @supportnashkids; and Instagram @supportnashvillekids. 

This article originally appeared in The Tennessee Tribune

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activism

Oakland NAACP President Stands on the Frontlines for Equity

With education as a cornerstone, Adams emphasized the importance of youth having access to quality kindergarten through 12th-grade education along with college or vocational programming beyond high school. “I feel that it’s so important for our children to get a good education in K-12th grade, along with the colleges of their choice, especially with the HBCU’s (Historically Black Colleges and Universities).”

Published

on

NAACP Oakland President Cynthia Adams. Photo Courtesy of Cynthia Adams.
NAACP Oakland President Cynthia Adams. Photo Courtesy of Cynthia Adams.

By Carla Thomas

For Cynthia Adams, president of the Oakland chapter of the NAACP, fighting for the rights of Black people comes naturally. With southern roots in Arkansas, Adams experienced firsthand the injustice and unfairness of racism.

“Growing up in the Jim Crow South, I experienced the unfair treatment of people of color and how faith can inspire communities to bring about positive and long-lasting change,” said Adams. Adams says a combination of her family and faith has kept her strong in the face of adversity and inspired her life’s work of advocacy.

Adams chose education as a career path — and a means to achieve equity and overcome racism. She earned her bachelor’s degree at the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff and later received an advanced degree from California State East Bay.

Adams’ experience as an Oakland Unified School District (OUSD) recorder, a counselor, a researcher, and a college recruiter has allowed her to be laser-focused on youth. She also served as the chairperson for the Oakland NAACP youth.

“The mission of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People is to ensure the political, educational, social, and economic equality of rights of all persons and to eliminate race-based discrimination. We want to ensure our citizens have equal rights and opportunities without discrimination based on race.”

As a partner with the State of California’s Stop the Hate campaign, Adams says the initiative is a step in the right direction. “It’s great that our governor and state created the Stop the Hate campaign and provides resources for victims of racism and other hate crimes,” said Adams. “The racism toward Black people has increased and our children are being targeted,” she continued.

“We, at the Oakland branch, created a declaration on racism that will amplify the needs of our community to combat racism,” continued Adams. “That declaration was adopted nationally.”

Bridging communities and collaborating is also a strategy for moving society toward justice, according to Adams.

“Through the NAACP, we build connections between communities and advocate for the rights of historically marginalized and oppressed individuals,” said Adams. “Collective action is the only way to advance civil rights and promote social equity.”

With education as a cornerstone, Adams emphasized the importance of youth having access to quality kindergarten through 12th-grade education along with college or vocational programming beyond high school. “I feel that it’s so important for our children to get a good education in K-12th grade, along with the colleges of their choice, especially with the HBCU’s (Historically Black Colleges and Universities).”

By taking stands on supporting former Oakland Police Chief LeRonne Armstrong to supporting the recall of a mayor faced with a scandal that brought negative national press to the city of Oakland, Adams has always demanded more for her people, and better for Oakland, the city she calls home.

She expressed pride in the national organization’s announcement of a $200 million fund designed to empower Black funders nationwide. “We all know the health of a community begins with economics,” said Adams.

Adams says that strengthening Black businesses automatically sustains a community. “We’ve also got to educate our community on opportunities and teach our children critical thinking so that they can provide the next generation of solutions for society,” said Adams.

Continue Reading

Activism

Expect The Worst? Political Scientists Have a Pessimism Bias, Study Finds

The research, co-authored by UC Berkeley political scientist Andrew T. Little, offers a possible solution: an approach that aggregates experts’ predictions, finds the middle ground, and then reduces the influence of pessimism, leading to the possibility of “remarkably accurate predictions.”

Published

on

Fears of unknown political outcomes. iStock image.
Fears of unknown political outcomes. iStock image.

Political experts surveyed recently were prone to pessimism — and were often wrong, says a study co-authored at UC Berkeley. Still, when their predictions were averaged out, they were ‘remarkably accurate’

By Edward Lempinen, UC Berkeley News

The past decade has seen historic challenges for U.S. democracy and an intense focus by scholars on events that seem to signal democratic decline. But new research released two weeks ago finds that a bias toward pessimism among U.S. political scientists often leads to inaccurate predictions about the future threats to democracy.

The research, co-authored by UC Berkeley political scientist Andrew T. Little, offers a possible solution: an approach that aggregates experts’ predictions, finds the middle ground, and then reduces the influence of pessimism, leading to the possibility of “remarkably accurate predictions.”

The study was released by Bright Line Watch, a consortium of political scientists who focus on issues related to the health of U.S. democracy. It offers provocative insight into political scientists’ predictions for the months ahead, including some that would be seen as alarming risks for democracy.

According to an analysis that Little distilled from a Bright Line Watch survey done after the November election, political scientists generally agreed that incoming Republican President Donald Trump is highly likely to pardon MAGA forces imprisoned for roles in the Jan. 6, 2021 uprising that sought to block the peaceful transfer of power from Trump to Democrat Joe Biden.

The research concluded that it’s less likely, but still probable, that Trump will pardon himself from a series of federal criminal convictions and investigations, and that his allies will open an investigation of Biden.

In understanding the future course of U.S. politics, Little said in an interview, it’s important to listen to the consensus of expert political scientists rather than to individual experts who, sometimes, become media figures based on their dire predictions.

“If we’re worried about being excessively pessimistic,” he explained, “and if we don’t want to conclude that every possible bad thing is going to happen, then we should make sure that we’re mainly worrying about things where there is wider consensus (among political scientists).”

Believe the Consensus, Doubt the Outliers

For example, the raw data from hundreds of survey responses studied by Little and Bright Line researchers showed that more than half of the political scientists also expected Trump to form a board that would explore the removal of generals; deport millions of immigrants; and initiate a mass firing of civil service government employees.

But once the researchers aggregated the scholars’ opinions, determined the average of their expectations and controlled for their pessimism bias, the consensus was that the likelihood of those developments falls well below 50%.

Bright Line Watch, founded in 2016, is based at the Chicago Center on Democracy and is collaboratively run by political scientists at the University of Chicago, Dartmouth College, the University of Michigan and the University of Rochester in New York.

The research collaboration between Little and the Bright Line Watch scholars sprang from a collegial disagreement that emerged last January in the pages of the journal Political Science and Politics.

Little and Anne Meng, a political scientist at the University of Virginia, authored a research paper in that issue positing that there is little empirical, data-based evidence of global democratic decline in the past decade.

At the request of the journal editors, scholars at Bright Line Watch submitted a study to counter the argument made by Meng and Little.

But in subsequent weeks, the two teams came together and, in the study released on Dec. 17, found agreement that raw opinion on the state of democracy skews toward pessimism among the political scientists who have participated in the surveys run by Bright Line Watch.

A Stark Measure of Pessimism (and Error)

Surveys conducted during election seasons in 2020, 2022 and 2024 asked political scientists to provide their forecasts on dozens of scenarios that would be, without doubt, harmful for democracy.

The raw data in the new study showed a high level of inaccuracy in the forecasts: While the political scientists, on average, found a 45% likelihood of the negative events happening, fewer than 25% actually came to pass.

Before last month’s election, Bright Line Watch asked the political scientists to assess dozens of possibilities that seemed to be ripped from the headlines. Would foreign hackers cripple voting systems? Would Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate, declare victory before the winner was called by the news media? Would Trump incite political violence again?

Altogether, the political scientists predicted a 44% probability for the list of negative events — but only 10% actually happened.

In the interview, Little defended the focus on possible negative developments by political scientists and others. It’s “very important” to be aware of the potential for harmful developments, he said.

But the focus on worst-case scenarios can also be distracting and destabilizing. The question, then, is why political scientists might develop a bias for pessimism.

To some extent, Little said, it may be a matter of expertise. The data show that scholars who specialize in American politics tend to be the least pessimistic — and the most accurate — forecasters. Political scientists with expertise in international relations, political theory or other areas tend to be more pessimistic and less reliable.

Little offered several other possible explanations. For example, he said, when scholars focus on one narrow area, like threats to democracy, they might see the potential threats with a heightened urgency. Their worry might shape the way they see the wider political world.

“People who study authoritarian politics are probably drawn to that because they think it’s an important problem, and they think it’s a problem that we need to address,” he explained. “If you spend a lot of your time and effort focusing on bad scenarios that might happen, you might end up thinking they’re more likely than they really are.”

And occasionally, he said, scholars may find that raising alarms about imminent dangers to democracy leads to more media invitations.

The Battle for Scholars’ Public Credibility

For the interwoven fields of political science and journalism — and for the wider health of democracy — accuracy is essential. That’s the value of the analytical system described by the authors of the new study. If researchers can find the expert consensus on complex issues and tone down unwarranted alarm, understanding should improve, and democracy should operate more efficiently.

Still, Little cautioned, it would be a mistake to discount or discard the insights offered by expert political scientists.

“You don’t want to say, ‘I’m just going to ignore the experts,’” he advised. “This research shows that that would be a very bad idea. Once you do the adjustments, the experts are very informed, and you can learn a lot from what they say.

Continue Reading

Activism

UC Berkeley’s 2024 Winter Commencement: A Day of Reflection, Celebration and Advice

In his remarks, Chancellor Rich Lyons encouraged graduates to consider all that they will carry with them. “You value truth and know it must be protected. You believe in science. You know that conventional wisdom and the status quo can and must always be challenged in order to find a better way,” he said. “I can only hope you share the gratitude I feel for these attributes, values, and aspirations that form the foundation of all that Berkeley is and stands for.”

Published

on

Lester Cedeño, left, and Jamie Hernandez, both of San Bernardino, California, pose with Monica Gomez of Vallejo, right, after the graduation ceremony. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.
Lester Cedeño, left, and Jamie Hernandez, both of San Bernardino, California, pose with Monica Gomez of Vallejo, right, after the graduation ceremony. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.

By Amy Cranch, UC Berkeley News

Prisha Bhadra said her journey to graduate from UC Berkeley began long before she set foot on campus. Her parents, who immigrated from India, “left behind familiarity, security, and every single loved one they had” to give her the chance to choose her own path. For students with immigrant roots, she said, “This moment feels bigger than just us. It’s the product of generations of hope. … This degree doesn’t just belong to me. It belongs to them.”

Bhadra, who majored in political science and minored in South Asian studies, represented more than 1,000 undergraduate and graduate students as the student speaker for the Class of 2024 Winter Commencement in Haas Pavilion on Dec. 21. Nearly 9,000 guests cheered the graduates on as their names were called and they walked across the court — often pausing to dance, take a selfie, or wave to proud onlookers.

Prisha Bhadra, class of 2024, is the daughter of Indian immigrants who left everything behind for her to have the opportunity for her education. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.

Prisha Bhadra, class of 2024, is the daughter of Indian immigrants who left everything behind for her to have the opportunity for her education. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.

Later in the ceremony, Chancellor Rich Lyons presented the Elise and Walter A. Haas International Award to Khadija Bakhtiar, who received a master’s degree in public policy in 2010. The award annually honors a UC Berkeley alum with a distinguished record of service to another country.

Bakhtiar founded Teach For Pakistan, which has recruited 600 talented young Pakistani graduates to teach more than 30,000 students in high-need public schools. She has also catalyzed a national movement to eliminate educational inequity and push for government investment in teacher-leadership models.

Commenting on her journey — which began at Berkeley, where she learned about Teach For America — Bakhtiar said that people didn’t think the program would work in Pakistan “because children from low-income backgrounds can’t make such rapid progress, or because public schools and school systems are too far gone to change,” she said. “It felt like I could see what lies beyond the mountain, but others couldn’t.”

Khadija Bakhtiar, left, received the Elise and Walter A. Haas International Award from UC Berkley Chancellor Rich Lyons. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.

Khadija Bakhtiar, left, received the Elise and Walter A. Haas International Award from UC Berkley Chancellor Rich Lyons. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.

But staying the course has reaped rewards. “I would have missed the moment where students are no longer ‘beneficiaries’ of a teaching program but ask in every school and classroom I visit, … ‘Tell us how we can help the larger movement,’” she said. “I might not have seen the young people who were floundering and overwhelmed in their first months of teaching grow to become school leaders, teacher trainers, entrepreneurs, [or] government advisers supporting learning for hundreds of thousands kids.”

In his remarks, Lyons encouraged graduates to consider all that they will carry with them. “You value truth and know it must be protected. You believe in science. You know that conventional wisdom and the status quo can and must always be challenged in order to find a better way,” he said. “I can only hope you share the gratitude I feel for these attributes, values, and aspirations that form the foundation of all that Berkeley is and stands for.”

Below, a few graduates share their favorite memories, advice for future students, and other tidbits on their Berkeley experience. Their responses have been edited for length and clarity.

Muki Barkan, Oakland, CA, law

Muki Barkan of Oakland, who received his degree in law, will take up criminal defense. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.

Muki Barkan of Oakland, who received his degree in law, will take up criminal defense. Photo by Keegan Houser/UC Berkeley.

Favorite class: A post-conviction and sentencing practicum with Chesa Boudin, the former district attorney of San Francisco. We got to help draft sentencing motions that the Alameda County DA would then file, and a good number of people who’d spent decades in prison got out because of it. That was pretty cool.

Aha moment: I came in wanting to do tenants’ defense and tenants’ rights, and I worked for the East Bay Community Law Center for a summer. That was interesting, but I really found that criminal defense was what I preferred when a friend of mine was unfairly convicted in Marin County for all kinds of reasons. That really struck me.

Extracurricular activities: I had a job outside of campus. I had a community in Oakland, so I did food distribution that I’ve been doing since before I came here, and sometimes we organized care villages. I spend a lot of time hiking in the hills by Berkeley, foraging mushrooms. I’ve got my chanterelle spots up there.

Lester Cedeño, San Bernardino, CA, integrative biology with an emphasis in human anatomy 

What you’ll miss most: The faculty. Every single one of the professors I had in integrative biology was so in tune with the courses that they teach and the wellness of their students. I’m going to miss that mentorship.

Jamie Hernandez, San Bernardino, CA, integrative biology

Favorite class: California natural history. A few years ago the teacher took us to the UC natural reserve in Pt. Reyes. He had memorized like a thousand bird calls. During the trip he would stop the car, pull out the binoculars, and make us look at the birds. It was a really good experience.

Monica Gomez, Vallejo, CA, integrative biology with an emphasis in wellness

What you’ll miss most: I appreciated all the libraries that we have here. They’re so big, and there are so many to choose from.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.