Housing
Opinion: Homeless Advocates Criticize Mayor’s Tuff Sheds
The following op-ed was written by members of the Homeless Advocacy Working Group, James Vann and John Kirkmire, who criticize Mayor Libby’s plan to build install Tuff Sheds in Oakland in response to the homelessness crisis:
In a meeting, the Homeless Advocacy Working (HAWG) told Mayor Libby Schaaf that Tuff Shed villages were not a worthy approach and would not be among HAWG’s menu of solutions.
The Tuff Sheds, however, have been good for Mayor Schaaf’s image. They give the outward un-scrutinized appearance of accomplishment, of something positive being done—despite their less than “drop in the bucket” impact on the real and escalating crisis.
The economics of Tuff Shed villages are actually worse than they appear.. The first Tuff Sheds village exceeded the amount budgeted. A total of $1.2 million over two years was authorized: including $300K/yr. for management and $200K/yr. for housing placement, which increased in year two, plus an additional $25K flex fund.
The remaining $200K went to fencing, security guards, insulation, and better door locks. The delivered price of the initial 8 X 10ft Tuff Shed units was $3,300 each, which the city had no funds for and got the Alta Bates foundation to pay for as donations.
The Public Works budget was unchanged, and none of the additional costs of water, sanitation, and trash removal are included in the homeless budget.
The 8 X 15ft Northgate Tuff Sheds (for which there is nothing in the budget) cost significantly more, and the sheds themselves were donated by Kaiser Foundation.
Pyatok Architects donated site design, construction of ramps and porches, and painting of the sheds.
Members of HAWG say that few residents are pleased with their residency, have complained bitterly about the initial management consultant, and per The Village manager, about seven of 10 return to the streets when their tenure terminates after six months.
The “Point-in-Time” count of unsheltered persons was 2,791 in Jan. 2017, a 26 percent increase in just two years since the 2015 count. HAWG estimates that the actual count is closer to 6,000, since people living in vehicles, couch-surfing, or camped in unusual places were not counted.
It is difficult to conclude that the city can be complimented for its job in treating its homelessness epidemic.
Passing by the Northgate Tuff Shed site, there seemed be a vast improvement over the out-of- control homeless encampments that overwhelmed the intersection at Northgate and 27th a few months ago.
The area is clean and orderly, and the green Tuff Sheds look way better than makeshift tents. It seemed to me the city, along with private donors, had found a useful path to address homelessness.
While the site is useful as a Navigation Center to help expedite available social services and hopefully process the homeless toward permanent housing, this ‘safe’ site can also be viewed as a controlled incarceration of the homeless, removing them from around the area and clustering them together where they need to sign in and out at a singular entry/exit point of the gated and barbed wire enclosure.
Each of the 20 units has two occupants assigned to it who then share a claustrophobic 15×8-foot space. There is NO running water on site. Screeching BART trains and endless noise of the overhead freeway make the site that much more symbolic of an uncaring community.
After touring inside Northgate, I have concluded that Tuff Sheds, now known as Cabins (an Orwellian name for tool sheds), are inhumane, undignified and a terrible way to treat the disenfranchised who have come to expect nothing but grief from a gentrified society.
To all the many well-intentioned people involved in this project, if any of us had to spend a full day/night on site, tool shed villages such as this would never have been created. It is reflection of the disrespect we have for the homeless.
There are about 7,000 housing units (currently) under construction in Oakland, but not one is directly focused on addressing the affordability issue. It is estimated there are 2500+ homeless people in Oakland.
Tuff Shed Sites are designed to assist only 40 people at a time. There are not enough statistics of successful transitioning to permanent housing to prove that these sites are worth their $1 million price tag for a year.
Activism
Port of Oakland to Host January Meeting for Interfaith Council of Alameda County
State, county, and city officials have been invited to join ICAC board members and the community to explore effective strategies for addressing these interconnected challenges across Alameda County, including ICAC’s Safe Car Park program expansion and efforts to convert trailers into shelter for the unhoused.
Special to The Post
The Interfaith Council of Alameda County (ICAC) will hold its first meeting of 2025 on Thursday, Jan. 9, at the Port of Oakland, located at 530 Water St. Hosted by the president of the Port of Oakland, the meeting will run from 1-2:30 p.m. and will focus on pressing community issues including environmental justice, housing solutions, and crime and safety.
State, county, and city officials have been invited to join ICAC board members and the community to explore effective strategies for addressing these interconnected challenges across Alameda County, including ICAC’s Safe Car Park program expansion and efforts to convert trailers into shelter for the unhoused.
All are welcome and encouraged to attend and contribute to this important discussion. For more information, visit interfaithAC.org.
Activism
Groundbreaking of Legacy Court to Bring Affordable Housing to North Richmond
A Dec. 16 ceremony marked the groundbreaking for the development, which will offer affordable housing to 42 low-income households earning between 30% to 60% of the area’s average income, as well as 13 units for “residents experiencing homelessness, those at risk of homelessness and individuals in need of mental health services,” the partners said in a statement. The development will be located at 1267 Fred Jackson Way in North Richmond.
By Kathy Chouteau, The Richmond Standard
Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC) and Eden Housing recently celebrated the groundbreaking of Legacy Court, a development that will bring affordable housing to North Richmond for low-income households and those experiencing homelessness.
A Dec. 16 ceremony marked the groundbreaking for the development, which will offer affordable housing to 42 low-income households earning between 30% to 60% of the area’s average income, as well as 13 units for “residents experiencing homelessness, those at risk of homelessness and individuals in need of mental health services,” the partners said in a statement. The development will be located at 1267 Fred Jackson Way in North Richmond.
Residents will have access to a variety of amenities such as a community room, community kitchen, laundry facilities, computer lab with high-speed internet and bike parking. Legacy Court will also be wholly electric with energy-efficient appliances and other green elements, with the aim of reducing the project’s carbon footprint.
Residents needing mental health services and related support will have access to Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services on-site.
Activism
OPINION: Solutions to the Housing Crisis Exist, but Governments Waste Tax Dollars Instead
People who are homeless want real housing, not temporary shelters that are dangerous and crowded. The City of Oakland has been telling the public that the sweeps of encampments are an effective solution, but it just pushes people from block to block, wasting tax money on paying police officers overtime in a budget crisis. This is true at the state level too, where California spends $42,000 per person that is unhoused per year. The city and state could just help pay residents’ rent, rather than pay for police to harass people on the streets, many of whom have disabilities or are elders.
By Kimberly King and Victoria King
In a powerful demonstration of grassroots organizing, activists joined forces in direct action that started on Dec. 17 to call for the establishment of sanctuary communities across the West Coast
The goal of the effort is to raise awareness about misleading narratives around homelessness and to present concrete solutions to a crisis that leaves over 35,000 people unsheltered each night in the Bay Area.
The action, led by members of Oakland’s Wood Street Commons and Homefullness/Poor Magazine, represents a direct response to the U.S. Supreme Court and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s approach to homelessness. At the core of the movement is a fundamental truth: housing is a human right, not a commodity to be bought and sold for profit.
People who are homeless want real housing, not temporary shelters that are dangerous and crowded. The City of Oakland has been telling the public that the sweeps of encampments are an effective solution, but it just pushes people from block to block, wasting tax money on paying police officers overtime in a budget crisis. This is true at the state level too, where California spends $42,000 per person that is unhoused per year. The city and state could just help pay residents’ rent, rather than pay for police to harass people on the streets, many of whom have disabilities or are elders.
The coalition of organizations, led by people with lived experience of homelessness, coordinated their efforts to show the unity behind this movement, including setting up sweeps-free sanctuary communities and resource centers and presenting solutions to city council. The message is clear: unhoused residents refuse to remain invisible in the face of policies that have resulted in 347 deaths for people experiencing homelessness in Alameda County just this year alone.
The coalition presented four key demands, each addressing different aspects of the housing crisis. First, they called for the establishment of sanctuary communities instead of sweeps, urging the redirection of encampment management funds toward positive solutions like encampment upgrades and permanent low to no-income housing.
The second demand focuses on utilizing public land for public good, specifically identifying vacant properties like the Hilton Hotel on Port of Oakland land. The coalition emphasized the immediate availability of these spaces to house hundreds of currently unhoused residents.
Prevention forms the third pillar of the coalition’s demands, with calls for strengthened renter’s rights, rent subsidies, and a permanent moratorium on rental evictions and foreclosures for non-payment.
Finally, the coalition demands the defunding of coercive “Care Courts,” advocating instead for non-carceral approaches to mental health care and harm reduction.
The Poor People’s Campaign’s motto, “When we lift from the bottom, no one gets left behind,” encapsulates the spirit of the action. Daily activities, including opening prayers for those who have died while homeless, served as powerful reminders of the human cost of failed housing policies that treat housing as a commodity rather than a fundamental right.
As this crisis continues to unfold, these activist groups have made it clear that the solution to homelessness must come from those most directly affected by it.
About the Authors
Kimberly King and Victoria King are Oakland Residents who advocate for the unhoused and propose solutions to end homelessness and housing insecurity.
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Books for Ghana
-
Arts and Culture4 weeks ago
Promise Marks Performs Songs of Etta James in One-Woman Show, “A Sunday Kind of Love” at the Black Repertory Theater in Berkeley
-
Bay Area3 weeks ago
Glydways Breaking Ground on 14-Acre Demonstration Facility at Hilltop Mall
-
Activism4 weeks ago
‘Donald Trump Is Not a God:’ Rep. Bennie Thompson Blasts Trump’s Call to Jail Him
-
Arts and Culture3 weeks ago
In ‘Affrilachia: Testimonies,’ Puts Blacks in Appalacia on the Map
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Living His Legacy: The Late Oscar Wright’s “Village” Vows to Inherit Activist’s Commitment to Education
-
Alameda County3 weeks ago
AC Transit Holiday Bus Offering Free Rides Since 1963
-
#NNPA BlackPress4 weeks ago
California, Districts Try to Recruit and Retain Black Teachers; Advocates Say More Should Be Done