Connect with us

Bay Area

Bay Area Residents Support ‘Stop Cop City’ Movement in Atlanta

Residents in Oakland and throughout the Bay Area are supporting efforts to stop the construction of The Atlanta Public Safety Training Center, which many refer to as ‘Cop City.” By a vote of 11-4, the Atlanta City Council approved $31 million to build the center on June 6 despite 14 hours of sometimes strident testimony from citizens and activists.

Published

on

At an art creating event in the Omni Commons in Oakland, activists hold a banner calling for divesting Bay Area public funds from The Atlanta Public Safety Training Center, which is commonly known as “Cop City.” Photo by Zack Haber on June 3.
At an art creating event in the Omni Commons in Oakland, activists hold a banner calling for divesting Bay Area public funds from The Atlanta Public Safety Training Center, which is commonly known as “Cop City.” Photo by Zack Haber on June 3.

By Zack Haber

Residents in Oakland and throughout the Bay Area are supporting efforts to stop the construction of The Atlanta Public Safety Training Center, which many refer to as ‘Cop City.”

By a vote of 11-4, the Atlanta City Council approved $31 million to build the center on June 6 despite 14 hours of sometimes strident testimony from citizens and activists.

The training center, if constructed, would be built on 85 acres city of Atlanta-owned forest in nearby DeKalb County. The area is part of what those working to stop Cop City call Weelaunee Forest, the name originated by the Muscogee Creek people who inhabited the land before the United States government removed them in the 1820s and 30s.

Plans released by The Atlanta Police Foundation, the non-profit organization that would build it, show the site is slated to include a mock village, shooting range, and driving range for police and fire / rescue training.

In Atlanta and the surrounding area, many residents have pushed back against the development of Cop City in a number of ways that include packing city hall during council meetings to speak out against its construction and living in Weelaunee Forest to protect it.

Those against constructing the site have claimed that its creation would both cause environmental harm, provide a site to further militarize policing, and negatively impact the psychological and physical well-being of the predominately Black residents who would live near it.

Atlanta Police officers have arrested over 40 Stop Cop City protesters in the Weelaunee Forest and charged them with domestic terror this year. In January, officers killed Tortuguita Terán, an indigenous Weelaunee Forest defender, by shooting them 57 times.

In a report from June of 2021 about the training center, The Atlanta Police Foundation wrote that a “violent crime surge in Atlanta underscores the urgency of our City’s need to make this investment.”

Data show reported violent crime in Atlanta decreased steadily from 2009 to 2018, then increased slightly in 2019 to 2021, when such crimes occurred about half as often as they had in 2009.

Documents shared through a records request with the Atlanta Community Press Collective show that The Atlanta Police Foundation plans to recruit 43% of Cop City trainees from “out-of-state.”

The collective shared concerns that Cop City would “likely function as a training center…where law enforcement agencies from different states, and possibly countries, would develop and share violent policing tactics.”

Out of desire to support those in the Atlanta area, stop the destruction of forest, and prevent the construction of a site that could be used to train police officers throughout the nation, Bay Area activists have been hosting rallies, fundraisers, political education, and art events to stop Cop City.

“This is a large struggle against one of the most concentrated examples of urban militarization in recent years,” said Juan V Luz, a Berkeley resident and supporter of the Stop Cop City movement. “It’s a site that would train people to harm people like me and maim and murder my friends. It’s important for those on the ground in the local struggle to know we have their backs.”

Luz was one of over 60 people who attended a Stop Cop City rally on May 30 in downtown Oakland. At the rally, speakers connected the plans to create Cop City with state reaction to the George Floyd protests and uprisings.

They also pointed out companies and contractors involved with funding and constructing the training center also operate in the Bay Area.

While the city of Atlanta approved allocating about $31 million into the creation of Cop City, The Atlanta Police Foundation is funding the rest, about $60 million, mostly though contributions through large corporations including UPS and Chick-fil-A.

A flyer distributed at the rally stated that protestors are calling for companies and contractors to “divest from The Atlanta Police Foundation.”

Protestors marched through downtown Oakland and entered into an office building where Atlas Technical Consultants operates at 555 12th Street. People working in the Stop Cop City movement have identified Atlas Technical Consultants as working directly with Brasfield & Gorrie, a primary contractor for the training site, and claim to have spotted Atlas vehicles in the Weelaunee Forest.

Atlas did not respond to multiple requests for comment on this article. While in the building, protestors chanted “Stop Cop City” and threw dried leaves, sticks, and flowers throughout the lobby.

Luz told The Oakland Post he felt that the action was a creative way to emphasize ecological factors of the Stop Cop City movement.

“The effort to replace a forest with a police training facility is peak 20th-century police power,” Luz said. “Bringing sticks and leaves into this swanky office building showed you can try to destroy the forest, but we’ll bring the forest to you.”

At a rally in San Francisco on March 15, protestors marched to Bank of America and Wells Fargo, companies which have contributed to The Atlanta Police Foundation, and demanded that they to stop funding Cop City.

During a political education class and art build at Omni Commons in Oakland on June 3, a group of researchers and activists presented a talk and a slideshow to several dozen people, and then attendees built banners to support the Stop Cop City Movement.

The presentation largely focused on Bay Area connections to Cop City. It mentioned Jestin Johnson, Oakland’s newly appointed city administrator, and his connections to Cop City. Johnson was part of a 13-member board in Atlanta that recommended Cop City’s location, funding model, and preliminary budget.

The presentation largely focused on Atlas Technical Consultants, and outlined over a dozen contracts Atlas has with public transportation agencies across California. A majority of these contracts are for work in the Bay Area

Three contracts are with BART specifically. The slideshow speculated that Atlas could seek a contract for the BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension. That extension’s major construction activities are set to begin in 2025.

One of the goals for the extension is creating “cleaner air.” A slide in the slideshow reads that it would be “counterproductive” to that goal if “the contractors who build it profit of off forest destruction.”

During the art building portion of the event, participants created banners demanding public transit agencies divest from contractors like Atlas unless they stop being involved in Cop City.

One read “no public dollars for cop city contractors,” emphasizing that contracts through public transit agencies are funded by the public through taxes.

At the rally in Oakland on May 30, protestors and groups that supported the march, like Critical Resistance and Black Rose Anarchist Federation, connected the Stop Cop City movement to the Stop Urban Shield Coalition.

Urban Shield, a yearly event hosted on the weekend of 9/11 which started occurring in 2007 in Oakland, was a large SWAT training and gear expo that would bring in about 200 law enforcement agencies to the area, welcomed rightwing extremists, and was financed federally by the Department of Homeland Security.

Starting in 2013, a grassroots coalition of labor unions, faith-based groups, and anti-war and racial justice groups began speaking out against Urban Shield, and pressured Oakland and Alameda County to stop hosting it. Oakland stopped hosting the event in 2014.

Urban Shield continued to occur yearly in Pleasanton until 2018, but then stopped occurring altogether after the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted to cut the program.

Mohamed Shehk, a campaigns director for Critical Resistance, a national grassroots organization that works to abolish the prison industrial complex, said that he sees “a lot of similarities” between Urban Shield and Cop City.

“Both programs are essentially rooted in a framework of police urban warfare and have used the veil of public safety as a way to expand policing power,” Shehk said.

Shehk hopes people of Atlanta working to stop Cop City can respond in a similar manner that the Stop Urban Shield Coalition did.

“After more than five years of organizing with the Stop Urban Shield Coalition we were able to defund and dismantle it,” Shehk said. “We are hopeful that the people of Atlanta can defund and dismantle Cop City.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activism

An Inside Look into How San Francisco Analyzes Homeless Encampments

Dozens of unhoused people are camped at Sixth and Jesse streets in San Francisco’s South of Market neighborhood. Tents made of tarps and blankets, piles of debris, and people lounging alongside the allies and walls of businesses are seen from all angles. These are some of the city’s hotspots. City crews have cleared encampments there over 30 times in the past year, but unhoused people always return.

Published

on

Since the ruling of Grants Pass by the US Supreme Court earlier this summer, which allows cities the authority to ban people from camping or sleeping on the streets, San Francisco has been at the head of the conversation to crack down on encampments.
Since the ruling of Grants Pass by the US Supreme Court earlier this summer, which allows cities the authority to ban people from camping or sleeping on the streets, San Francisco has been at the head of the conversation to crack down on encampments.

By Magaly Muñoz

Dozens of unhoused people are camped at Sixth and Jesse streets in San Francisco’s South of Market neighborhood. Tents made of tarps and blankets, piles of debris, and people lounging alongside the allies and walls of businesses are seen from all angles.

These are some of the city’s hotspots. City crews have cleared encampments there over 30 times in the past year, but unhoused people always return.

But it’s normal to have tents set up again within less than 24 hours after an encampment sweep, David Nakanishi, Healthy Streets Operation Center Manager at the Department of Emergency Management, says. Sometimes there’s less people than before but often there is also no change.

“Most of the people that were in the encampments that want to go inside, we’ve gotten the majority of those [into shelter],” Nakanishi says. “Many of the people we encounter now, are those who have various reasons to not accept shelter, and some are already in shelter/housing”.

Since the ruling of Grants Pass by the US Supreme Court earlier this summer, which allows cities the authority to ban people from camping or sleeping on the streets, San Francisco has been at the head of the conversation to crack down on encampments.

Where neighboring cities in the Bay Area are clearing encampments a few days a week, San Francisco is sweeping 10 times a week, two per weekday.

David Nakanishi, Healthy Streets Operation Center Manager at the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management, makes a 311 report on an encampment in the Mission District. These reports allow smaller city teams to tackle individual spots where unhoused people frequent. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

David Nakanishi, Healthy Streets Operation Center Manager at the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management, makes a 311 report on an encampment in the Mission District. These reports allow smaller city teams to tackle individual spots where unhoused people frequent. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Considering the controversy that plagues the city around its harsh policies, the Post decided to tag along on a ride with Nakanishi to show us how he decides what encampments make it on the city’s sweep list.

Nakanishi, having over 20 years of experience in homelessness management, drives around the busiest parts of the city almost daily. He’s tasked with arranging a weekly sweeping operation schedule for city teams to engage with unhoused folks to help get them off the streets.

So what exactly is he looking out for when deciding what encampments get swept?

It depends, he says.

Locations like schools, recreational centers, senior centers, or businesses are places he tends to want to address quickly, especially schools. These are the places where the complaints are highest and access to facilities is important for residents.

He says he also takes into account 311 calls and reports made to him by city staff. On the date of publication, over 100 calls and reports were made about encampments around the city, according to San Francisco data.

Makeshift structures built from plywood and tarps are starting to pop up more throughout the city. Certain areas under freeways are not under direct authority from San Francisco, making it harder to sweep these encampments. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Makeshift structures built from plywood and tarps are starting to pop up more throughout the city. Certain areas under freeways are not under direct authority from San Francisco, making it harder to sweep these encampments. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Nakanishi made a few 311 reports himself on the ride along, pulling over to take photos and describe the encampments into his 311 app. He says it helps him remember where to possibly sweep next or allows smaller teams in the city to engage quicker with individuals on the streets.

Nakanishi also looks at the state of the encampments. Are there a lot of bulky items, such as furniture, or makeshift structures built out of tarps and plywood, blocking areas of traffic? Is trash beginning to pile up and spill into the streets or sidewalks? Sites that meet this criteria tend to be contenders for encampment sweeps, Nakanishi says.

Street by street, he points out individuals he’s interacted with, describing their conditions, habits, and reasons for denying assistance from the city.

One man on 2nd St and Mission, who rolls around a blue recycling bin and often yells at passing pedestrians, has refused shelter several times, Nakanishi says.

People deny shelter for all kinds of reasons, he says. There’s too many rules to follow, people feel unsafe in congregate or shared shelters, or their behavioral and mental health problems make it hard to get them into proper services.

Inside a tent left by an unhoused man on Stevenson and 14th Street in San Francisco. The area smelled of human waste and leftover alcohol. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Inside a tent left by an unhoused man on Stevenson and 14th Street in San Francisco. The area smelled of human waste and leftover alcohol. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Nakanishi references another man on South Van Ness under the freeway, who city outreach have attempted to get into shelter, but his screaming outbursts make it difficult to place him without disturbing other people in the same space. Nakanishi says it might be an issue of the man needing resources like medication to alleviate his distress that causes the screaming, but the city behavioral team is in the process of outreaching him to figure that out.

In October, city outreach teams engaged with 495 unhoused people. 377 of those engaged refused shelter and only 118 accepted placements, according to city data. That number of monthly referrals is consistent throughout the entirety of 2024 so far.

Nakanishi has long advocated for the well-being of unhoused people, he explains. In 2004, he was working with the Department of Public Health and told then-Mayor Gavin Newsom that there needed to be more housing for families. Nakinishi was told it was easier to deal with individuals first and the city “will get there eventually.” 20 years later, family housing is still not as extensive as it could be, and the waiting list to get placements for families is a mile long with over 500 names.

In 2020, he was a Senior Behavioral Health Clinician at a hotel in the city during the pandemic. He says in 2021 he collaborated with DPH to provide vaccines to those staying in the makeshift hotel shelters once those became available.

Nakanishi strips apart a solo tent on Stevenson and 14th Street in San Francisco. He discards items, like tarps and cardboard, so that people cannot reuse them to make another sleeping structure. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Nakanishi strips apart a solo tent on Stevenson and 14th Street in San Francisco. He discards items, like tarps and cardboard, so that people cannot reuse them to make another sleeping structure. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Despite the constant media attention that city outreach is inhumanely treating homeless people, so much so that it has led to lawsuits against San Francisco from advocates, Nakanishi says not a lot of people are seeing the true conditions of some encampments.

He describes soiled clothing and tents, drenched in urine, and oftentimes rodents or bug infestations in places where people are sleeping. He’s asked homeless advocates- often those who are the most critical about the city’s work- who have shown up to observe the sweeps if those are conditions the city should allow people to be subjected to, but not many have answers for him, Nakanishi says.

The city’s “bag and tag” policy allows city workers to throw away items that are “soiled by infectious materials” such as bodily fluids and waste.

Sweep operations are conducted at 8am and 1pm Monday through Friday. People at the encampments are given 72 hour notice to vacate, but some don’t leave the area until the day of the sweep.

City outreach workers come out the day before and day of to offer resources and shelter to those interested. The Department of Public Works discards any trash that is left over from the sweep and washes down the area.

Nakanishi told the Post that the only time the city takes tents or personal possessions from residents is when folks become physically violent towards workers and police take the items as evidence. Other items taken are bagged and tagged in accordance with city policy.

Stories from local newspapers such as the San Francisco Standard and the Chronicle show instances of SFPD handcuffing residents while their items are thrown in the trash or disposing of personal possessions without reason.

Advocates have long been pushing for a more competent and compassionate process if the city is going to choose to continue sweeping unhouse people.

No matter the lawsuits and constant criticisms from allies, the encampment sweeps are not slowing down, even with the cold weather quickly approaching the coastal city.

Nakanishi says there aren’t a lot of large encampments left in San Francisco so now they do runs of streets in order to stretch out the sweeps as much as possible.

It’s calculated strategies and years of first hand knowledge that make this job work, “It takes dedication to the work, caring for the people and the community, and persistence, patience and sometimes good luck to make the positive changes for the people on the street,” Nakanishi says.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of November 13 – 19, 2024

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of November 13 – 19, 2024

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Activism

LIVE! — TOWN HALL ON RACISM AND ITS IMPACT — THURS. 11.14.24 5PM PST

Join us for a LIVE Virtual Town Hall on the Impact of Racism hosted by Post News Group Journalist Carla Thomas and featuring Oakland, CA NAACP President Cynthia Adams & other Special Guests.
Thursday, November 14, 2024, 5 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. PST

Published

on

Join us for a LIVE Virtual Town Hall on the Impact of Racism hosted by Post News Group Journalist Carla Thomas and featuring Oakland, CA NAACP President Cynthia Adams & other Special Guests.
Thursday, November 14, 2024
5 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. PST

Discussion Topics:
• Since the pandemic, what battles have the NAACP fought nationally, and how have they impacted us locally?
• What trends are you seeing concerning Racism? Is it more covert or overt?
• What are the top 5 issues resulting from racism in our communities?
• How do racial and other types of discrimination impact local communities?
• What are the most effective ways our community can combat racism and hate?

Your questions and comments will be shared LIVE with the moderators and viewers during the broadcast.

STREAMED LIVE!
FACEBOOK: facebook.com/PostNewsGroup
YOUTUBE: youtube.com/blackpressusatv
X: twitter.com/blackpressusa

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.