#NNPA BlackPress
BLDG Memphis issues housing and transit survey to Memphis mayoral, city council candidates
NEW TRI-STATE DEFENDER — As many Memphis residents lament a lack of mayoral debates, BLDG Memphis is taking a different approach to capturing candidates’ policy plans for the public record.
By Cole Bradley
As many Memphis residents lament a lack of mayoral debates, BLDG Memphis is taking a different approach to capturing candidates’ policy plans for the public record.
“We hope to get a commitment from anyone who’s potentially going to be in office for the next four years that we will be growing resources for community development work in neighborhoods across Memphis,” said BLDG Memphis’ executive director, John Paul Shaffer.
On Saturday, September 7, Shaffer and his team sent links to the BLDG Memphis 2019 Memphis City Candidate Questionnaire to all 64 Memphis mayoral and city council candidates. The survey will remain open for responses until the end of early voting.
Early voting runs September 13-28. Final voting and election day are October 3.
BLDG Memphis plans to make candidates’ responses available to the public as they are submitted.
Candidates were contacted by email or Facebook where available. Candidates were also sent notice by mail to their home addresses. Candidates who did not received an electronic link and would like one can contact engage@bldgmemphis.org.
The 2019 Memphis City Candidate Questionnaire consists of three questions.
The first asks candidates if they support the newly established Memphis Affordable Housing Trust Fund and support increasing the fund from a recurring source for long-term sustainability.
The newly created trust fund will spend $1 million in its first year to address owner-occupied home repair and single-family home renovation for re-sale and rent to families earning less than 80% of the area median income. There’s flexibility to address other housing needs like affordable multifamily units in the future.
Related: “Podcast: An affordable housing trust fund for Memphis”
The second and third BLDG Memphis candidate questions address transportation and safety.
The first states that Memphis is the most dangerous city in Tennessee for pedestrians and asks how candidates will address safe streets across all modes of transportation.
The final question notes that Memphis 3.0’s new Transit Vision calls for a $30 million annual increase in public transit funding for an expanded network of higher-frequency routes. It then asks candidates if they will support efforts to find the necessary funding to implement the Transit Vision and serve Memphis neighborhoods more effectively.
Shaffer said polling not just mayoral candidates but city council candidates too was especially important because even without formal debates, mayoral candidates receive more focus and a bigger platform to express their positions. City council candidates, on the other hand, get less attention and aren’t asked to articulate positions or policies as frequently.
As a result, the council competition often comes down to name recognition.
“We’re putting these questions out there for candidates running for local office to just get a sense of where they stand on these two issues that are very important to our membership and our network,” said Shaffer.
BLDG Memphis is comprised of a coalition of local organizations, including 28 nonprofit community development corporations working in neighborhoods across Memphis and 20 supporting agencies in the economic development and financial sectors.
BLDG Memphis does not endorse or provide financial resources to candidates for public office, but it has been working to expand its policy work to reflect its members’ biggest ongoing concerns in their communities’ development.
Housing and transportation are consistently among those concerns.
The organization felt a non-partisan questionnaire could provide unbiased information to their members and the public.
“BLDG Memphis members are mostly made up of community development corporation leaders, neighborhood leaders, individuals in the community. They’re representing different neighborhoods and community groups from Raleigh down to Whitehaven,” said Amy Schaftlein, executive director of United Housing, a BLDG Memphis coalition member.
United Housing developed the candidate question regarding the affordable housing trust fund. United Housing’s work centers on improving access to quality affordable housing in Memphis and they believe the trust fund is a critical step towards investing in the city.
“It’s time for the city to say, ‘We do know that poor housing has caused many other areas of our city’s [living], health and public safety costs to increase,’” said Schaftlein.
Shaftlein said that the current $1 million allotment for the trust fund can only fund renovation and building for around 18-20 houses, which is why the question posed to candidates asked if they would support expanding the trust fund.
“While we’re super excited about the creation of a housing trust fund and having it funded this year, there’s still a lot more that needs to be done that that’s not going to cover,” she said.
Shaffer and Shaftlein both said they hope all candidates will respond to the questionnaire so their positions are on record and BLDG Memphis’ city-wide membership and all of the voters they represent can hold future leaders accountable to the promises they make today.
“[BLDG Memphis’ membership] is a very diverse group, but we all have one thing in common and that is we love our neighborhoods, we love our city,” said Shaftlein.
“We want to make sure that the things we think can move us forward are being discussed and brought to the forefront of discussion and the election. It’s important work and we want to hold everyone who is elected accountable to what they say they’re going to support.”
Visit the Memphis Public Library’s Informed Voter pages here to learn about the races and candidates in Memphis’ upcoming election and encourage their participation in the BLDG Memphis housing and transit survey.
This article originally appeared in the New Tri-State Defender
#NNPA BlackPress
OP-ED: The Illusion of Allyship. White Women, Your Yard Signs Mean Nothing to Me
NNPA NEWSWIRE – “The blue bracelets are something White women are wearing so others can see that they didn’t vote for Trump,” says Liberal Lisa from Oklahoma on X. Chile, bye. These bracelets are hollow symbols, empty gestures that mean nothing to me. An accessory to claim distance from Trump’s legacy is superficial comfort, while the choice to not stand with us in the voting booth is far more profound.
Political yard signs can symbolize intentions and allegiance. But this year, they’ve also symbolized betrayal. During this general election, Black women were led to believe that more White women would stand with us. Exit polls, however, told a different story. Despite overwhelming displays of support, more White women still chose to vote for the convicted felon, reality TV star, and rapist. White women answered the call but left us hanging at the polls.
A Familiar Disappointment
I live in DeKalb County, Georgia, and the abundance of Harris-Walz yard signs could’ve fooled me. But I’ve seen this before, back when Stacey Abrams ran for governor. White women showed up, put up signs, attended rallies, knocked on doors, and phone-banked. Yet, when it came time to vote, they let us down—not once but twice. I’ve been here for over 15 years, and if there’s one thing I know, it’s that political signs are symbols without weight.
In every election, I’ve talked with White women. Most aren’t the primary earners in their families and vote along party lines, aligning with the preferences of their fathers and husbands. These conversations reveal a reluctance to break from tradition, even when their votes affect women and certainly when their votes impact the lives of people who look like me.
The Illusion of Solidarity—Symbols Are Not Enough
On social media, I’m seeing White women posting pictures of blue bracelets to “prove” they didn’t vote for Trump. “The blue bracelets are something White women are wearing so others can see that they didn’t vote for Trump,” says Liberal Lisa from Oklahoma on X. Chile, bye. These bracelets are hollow symbols, empty gestures that mean nothing to me. An accessory to claim distance from Trump’s legacy is superficial comfort, while the choice to not stand with us in the voting booth is far more profound.
I’ve seen Black Lives Matter signs and black squares posted on Instagram to “prove” support for Black people, but we now know that was a lie, too. Will those same people who claimed Black lives mattered now take down their Harris-Walz signs and show their true selves?
Navigating these truths is a daily struggle for me—professionally and socially. White women often misuse their privilege, supporting us only when it’s convenient. Seeing overqualified Black women sabotaged or abandoned by White women at critical moments is a constant emotional challenge. It’s exhausting to live with this reality, especially when solidarity seems like something they pick up and discard at will.
One clever campaign ad from Harris-Walz that spoke directly to White women. “Your Vote, Your Choice” emphasized that their vote was private—independent of their household situation. Another was from Olivia Howell Dreizen, the “Vote Without Fear” campaign, which empowered women to consider the greater impact of their choices. But it seems many still couldn’t choose the roadmap to freedom—even when it was handed to them.
A Call for Action Beyond Words
White women, I want to believe you care, but actions speak louder than yard signs, bracelets, or Instagram posts. Show up in our communities, advocate in your workplaces, and stand up to dismantle the structures that uphold white supremacy. Only through real action will we know where you stand.
If you choose not to act, we see you—and we know exactly where you stand. Good luck these next four years.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of BlackPressUSA.com or the National Newspaper Publishers Association.
#NNPA BlackPress
Supernova Parenting Conference Empowers Over 100 Parents with Resources for Neurodivergence and Mental Health
The inaugural Supernova Parenting Conference was co-hosted by Natasha Nelson, known as Supernova Momma, and Yolanda Walker, founder of Parenting Decolonized. It brought together over 100 parents, caregivers, and educators dedicated to fostering understanding and support for neurodivergent children and mental health challenges. The conference provided invaluable resources, expert insights, and a collaborative space for […]
The inaugural Supernova Parenting Conference was co-hosted by Natasha Nelson, known as Supernova Momma, and Yolanda Walker, founder of Parenting Decolonized. It brought together over 100 parents, caregivers, and educators dedicated to fostering understanding and support for neurodivergent children and mental health challenges. The conference provided invaluable resources, expert insights, and a collaborative space for connection, marking a significant step toward creating a more inclusive parenting community.
The event featured a variety of workshops, panel discussions, and keynote speeches from leading experts in neurodiversity and mental health. Attendees left with practical tools and strategies to enhance their parenting journeys, emphasizing the importance of understanding and supporting the unique needs of neurodivergent children.
“While the conference was a tremendous success, we believe that our work doesn’t end here,” said Natasha Nelson. “It’s crucial to continue providing ongoing support and resources for parents as they navigate this important journey. We want to ensure families can access the tools they need long after the conference.”
To extend the momentum generated at the conference, Natasha and Yolanda are excited to announce the launch of the Supernova Parenting Community. This membership-based initiative aims to offer a safe and supportive environment for parents and caregivers to continue their growth as conscious parents.
Membership is available for as little as $5 a month via Patreon, making it accessible for all families seeking support.
“We know that parenting can be a challenging journey, especially when navigating neurodivergence and mental health issues,” Yolanda Walker added. “Our goal is to build a community where parents feel seen, heard, and supported. We hope you’ll join us in this vital work.”
For more information about the Supernova Parenting Community and to sign up for membership, please visit supernovaparenting.org
#NNPA BlackPress
Election Night on The Yard at Howard University
Election Night on The Yard at Howard University
-
Alameda County3 weeks ago
Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price Announces $7.5 Million Settlement Agreement with Walmart
-
Activism2 weeks ago
‘Jim Crow Was and Remains Real in Alameda County (and) It Is What We Are Challenging and Trying to Fix Every Day,’ Says D.A. Pamela Price
-
Activism4 weeks ago
OP-ED: Hydrogen’s Promise a Path to Cleaner Air and Jobs for Oakland
-
Bay Area3 weeks ago
In the City Attorney Race, Ryan Richardson Is Better for Oakland
-
Activism2 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of October 30 – November 5, 2024
-
Business4 weeks ago
Harris Promises 1 Million Forgivable Loans for Black Businesses
-
Business4 weeks ago
Study Confirms California’s $20/Hour Fast Food Wage Raises Pay Without Job Losses
-
Community4 weeks ago
Terry T. Backs Oakland Comedy Residency by Oakland’s Luenell at Jimmy Kimmel’s Comedy Club in Las Vegas