Community
Israel running again for Broward sheriff’s job
FLORIDA COURIER — Ousted Broward Sheriff Scott Israel took another step on his comeback campaign Monday when he filed the paperwork to launch a reelection bid. Israel, first elected in 2012 and again in 2016, lost his job as Broward’s top cop in January when newly elected Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended him from office and blamed him for the Broward Sheriff’s Office’s botched response to the Feb. 14, 2018, shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
By David Smiley
MIAMI — Ousted Broward Sheriff Scott Israel took another step on his comeback campaign Monday when he filed the paperwork to launch a reelection bid.
Israel, first elected in 2012 and again in 2016, lost his job as Broward’s top cop in January when newly elected Gov. Ron DeSantis suspended him from office and blamed him for the Broward Sheriff’s Office’s botched response to the Feb. 14, 2018, shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
Israel, 63, is challenging his removal.
Filed paperwork
But regardless of whether he’s reinstated by the Florida Senate — which under Florida law has the power to overturn a governor’s suspension — Israel would need to be elected in 2020 in order to run the agency going forward.
He began that process Monday when he walked into the Broward Supervisor of Election’s office and submitted paperwork to open a campaign account.
Israel did not respond immediately to a text message seeking comment.
Accreditation revoked
Last week, a state panel voted unanimously to revoke BSO’s accreditation, citing the agency’s mishandling of the response to shootings in Parkland and the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport as the grounds for its decision.
Israel will presumably run against Gregory Tony, the former Coral Springs sergeant DeSantis appointed to run BSO upon Israel’s suspension.
Tony, who owns a firm specializing in mass casualty incidents, has not yet filed paperwork but has said he will run to keep his job in 2020.
Israel, a Democrat, joins a crowded field. H. Wayne Clark, Willie Jones, Al Pollock, David Rosenthal, Andrew Maurice Smalling, and Santiago C. Vazquez Jr. have already opened campaigns, though none of the candidates has raised much money to date.
This article originally appeared in the Florida Courier.
Alameda County
Funds Available for Nonprofits Assisting Marin’s Households
As of Jan. 22, applications are being accepted within the County of Marin’s annual funding cycle for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) grants. Both are administered by the Marin County Community Development Agency (CDA), which leverages several local, state, and federal funding sources for the programs.

Feb. 19 is the deadline to apply for more than $3.6 million; Webinars set for Jan. 29
Special to The Post
An annual funding opportunity is now open for developers and nonprofits considering projects focused on the creation of affordable housing, community infrastructure and other services in Marin County – especially those designed to assist local lower-income households. All told, $3.6 million is on the table.
As of Jan. 22, applications are being accepted within the County of Marin’s annual funding cycle for Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) grants. Both are administered by the Marin County Community Development Agency (CDA), which leverages several local, state, and federal funding sources for the programs.
CDA also administers the State of California’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation, including a 1-to-1 match from the Marin Affordable Housing Fund. This year, in partnership with the City of San Rafael, applicants may also apply for City of San Rafael Affordable Housing Trust Funds (AHTP) through the same application.
Local agencies have until 5 p.m. Wednesday, Feb. 19, to apply for the funds. Application webinars will be held online Wednesday, Jan. 29, to provide details to potential applicants.
Many residents struggle to meet basic needs with housing, health, childcare, and food security. Marin has one of the highest median household incomes in California – $186,600 for a family of four. However, it also has some of the highest home prices and development costs in the country. The median local price for a single-family, detached home has neared $1.8 million in recent months, and typical rents range from $2,500 to $3,400.
There is increasing pressure on charitable organizations to provide help. The federal grants program offers funding to those nonprofits delivering key services to the community with a minimum grant size of $15,000.
Application materials for the 2025 cycle are available on CDA’s Notice of Funding Availability webpage and in CDA’s Marin County Civic Center office at 3501 Civic Center Drive, Suite 308, in San Rafael. The office is open weekdays from 8 a.m. 4 p.m.
Applications are assessed on how they meet funding priorities and goals, affirmatively further fair housing, serve low-income residents and serve local members of protected classes based on race, gender, disability, and other factors. The grants are not available to individuals; those in need of housing assistance and resources are encouraged to review the County’s Housing Help webpage.
During the Jan. 29 webinars, participants will learn more about the application process, types of eligible projects, and new project requirements. The sessions are organized into two distinct presentations:
- 1:30-2:30 p.m. – Community Infrastructure (Capital) and Public Service Projects
- 2:30-3:30 p.m. – Housing Projects
CDA staff members are available throughout the application process to consult with organizations unable to attend the online sessions. Office hours will be held throughout the application process; register via the division’s webpage. For more details, email the Housing and Federal Grants Division.
Staff will review applications and conduct public hearings about recommended allocations this spring. By June, the Board of Supervisors will hold a final public hearing and make recommendations to be submitted to the federal government. Approved allocations would be received by the applicants by autumn.
The County of Marin Media Relations Department is the source for this story.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of March 19 – 25, 2025
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of March 19 – 25, 2025

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
#NNPA BlackPress
Recently Approved Budget Plan Favors Wealthy, Slashes Aid to Low-Income Americans
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — The most significant benefits would flow to the highest earners while millions of low-income families face cuts

By Stacy M. Brown
BlackPressUSA.com Senior National Correspondent
The new budget framework approved by Congress may result in sweeping changes to the federal safety net and tax code. The most significant benefits would flow to the highest earners while millions of low-income families face cuts. A new analysis from Yale University’s Budget Lab shows the proposals in the House’s Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Resolution would lead to a drop in after-tax-and-transfer income for the poorest households while significantly boosting revenue for the wealthiest Americans. Last month, Congress passed its Concurrent Budget Resolution for Fiscal Year 2025 (H. Con. Res. 14), setting revenue and spending targets for the next decade. The resolution outlines $1.5 trillion in gross spending cuts and $4.5 trillion in tax reductions between FY2025 and FY2034, along with $500 billion in unspecified deficit reduction.
Congressional Committees have now been instructed to identify policy changes that align with these goals. Three of the most impactful committees—Agriculture, Energy and Commerce, and Ways and Means—have been tasked with proposing major changes. The Agriculture Committee is charged with finding $230 billion in savings, likely through changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps. Energy and Commerce must deliver $880 billion in savings, likely through Medicaid reductions. Meanwhile, the Ways and Means Committee must craft tax changes totaling no more than $4.5 trillion in new deficits, most likely through extending provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Although the resolution does not specify precise changes, reports suggest lawmakers are eyeing steep cuts to SNAP and Medicaid benefits while seeking to make permanent tax provisions that primarily benefit high-income individuals and corporations.
To examine the potential real-world impact, Yale’s Budget Lab modeled four policy changes that align with the resolution’s goals:
- A 30 percent across-the-board cut in SNAP funding.
- A 15 percent cut in Medicaid funding.
- Permanent extension of the individual and estate tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
- Permanent extension of business tax provisions including 100% bonus depreciation, expense of R&D, and relaxed limits on interest deductions.
Yale researchers determined that the combined effect of these policies would reduce the after-tax-and-transfer income of the bottom 20 percent of earners by 5 percent in the calendar year 2026. Households in the middle would see a modest 0.6 percent gain. However, the top five percent of earners would experience a 3 percent increase in their after-tax-and-transfer income.
Moreover, the analysis concluded that more than 100 percent of the net fiscal benefit from these changes would go to households in the top 20 percent of the income distribution. This happens because lower-income groups would lose more in government benefits than they would gain from any tax cuts. At the same time, high-income households would enjoy significant tax reductions with little or no loss in benefits.
“These results indicate a shift in resources away from low-income tax units toward those with higher incomes,” the Budget Lab report states. “In particular, making the TCJA provisions permanent for high earners while reducing spending on SNAP and Medicaid leads to a regressive overall effect.” The report notes that policymakers have floated a range of options to reduce SNAP and Medicaid outlays, such as lowering per-beneficiary benefits or tightening eligibility rules. While the Budget Lab did not assess each proposal individually, the modeling assumes legislation consistent with the resolution’s instructions. “The burden of deficit reduction would fall largely on those least able to bear it,” the report concluded.
-
#NNPA BlackPress3 weeks ago
Target Takes a Hit: $12.4 Billion Wiped Out as Boycotts Grow
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Undocumented Workers Are Struggling to Feed Themselves. Slashed Budgets and New Immigration Policies Bring Fresh Challenges
-
#NNPA BlackPress3 weeks ago
BREAKING Groundbreaking Singer Angie Stone Dies in Car Accident at 63
-
#NNPA BlackPress3 weeks ago
Apple Shareholders Reject Effort to Dismantle DEI Initiatives, Approve $500 Billion U.S. Investment Plan
-
#NNPA BlackPress3 weeks ago
NAACP Legend and Freedom Fighter Hazel Dukes Passes
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of February 26 – March 4, 2025
-
#NNPA BlackPress3 weeks ago
Seniors Beware: O’Malley Says Trump-Musk Cuts Will Cripple Social Security
-
#NNPA BlackPress3 weeks ago
Trump Kicks the Ukrainian President Out of the White House