City Government
Noni Session Faces Lynette McElhaney in District 3 Race
With nearly one month left before Oaklanders head to the voting booths, City Council candidates are ramping up their campaign efforts to reach undecided voters.
District 3 is seeing political newcomer Noni Session campaigning for the seat occupied by incumbent Lynette Gibson McElhaney.
Session is a West Oakland native and the daughter of Major Session Jr. and Carolyn Session.
According to Session, she is running a grassroots campaign on a progressive platform of community empowerment to address her district’s most pressing issues—which include displacement, funding for jobs and police accountability.
She has the endorsements of SEIU 1021, Alameda Labor Council, National Union of Healthcare Workers and the John George Democratic Club.
McElhaney is also a West Oakland native who has served as City Council president for the past four years.
McElhaney has not responded to weeks of requests from the Post for an interview or responded to written questions, and information about her campaign was gathered from her website.
Her platform focuses on increasing community policing and lists a track record of changes that she has helped bring about in Oakland during her tenure as a council member.
Housing affordability is one of West Oakland’s ever-increasing challenges, and the Post asked both candidates how they would address the issue.
“My number one concern is keeping people here and ending Oakland’s housing crisis,” Session told the Post.
Session said she plans to stop the outflow of longtime Oakland residents by vigorously enforcing the renter protection ballot measure known as Measure JJ and has been campaigning strongly to get the measure passed in November.
“We also want to reevaluate the definition of affordable housing, since the average Black Oaklander makes $30,000 a year and the average white Oaklander makes $80,000,” she said. Currently, affordable housing is set for households making up to $110,000 a year.
McElhaney has helped take steps to improve the housing crisis during the past four years, by voting on establishing impact fees on market-rate developments to help fund affordable housing.
She also “led efforts that established dedicated funding for the affordable housing trust fund,” according to her website.
In terms of jobs for local residents and African Americans, West Oakland has been hit particularly hard recently with the threatened closure of its only neighborhood job center.
McElhaney was able to help secure temporary relief to keep the job center open and Session vows to fully fund and reopen West Oakland’s local employment development offices.
“Right now, the city takes some of the federal money for jobs off the top,” said Session. “We could take a lot less off the top for administration to keep these centers open.”
According to McElhaney’s website, she also saved hundreds of West Oakland jobs by supporting Cal Waste Solutions, a locally-controlled recycling company.
Yet McElhaney has not addressed the closing of Alliance Metals in her district, a recycling center which was the sole source of income for many of West Oakland’s homeless.
Where the two candidates differ the most is in their approach to public safety and community policing.
In the wake of the Oakland Police Department’s recent sex-crime scandal and a slew of killings of Black men in the past year, Session calls for strengthening police accountability and to shift residency requirements for officers.
“I would like for an officer who has state power over me to also be my neighbor,” Session said. “It’s important that my own community is empowered to keep my own community safe.”
Meanwhile, McElhaney’s public safety platform focuses on reducing crime in West Oakland neighborhoods by increasing police presence in communities.
On her website, McElhaney cites adding 150 officers to OPD since she got into office and helping get Measure Z passed, which secures $30 million annually to pay for crime reduction services.
Session is pushing for a different approach to help reduce crime in her community— making sure that youth summer jobs programs get funding.
“We need to make sure that the kids who could be a source of violence get the resources and opportunities that they need,” said Session.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of December 31, 2025 – January 6, 2026
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 31, 2025 – January 6, 2026
To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of December 24 – 30, 2025
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 24 – 30, 2025
To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Alameda County
Oakland Council Expands Citywide Security Cameras Despite Major Opposition
In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”
By Post Staff
The Oakland City Council this week approved a $2.25 million contract with Flock Safety for a mass surveillance network of hundreds of security cameras to track vehicles in the city.
In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”
In recent weeks hundreds of local residents have spoken against the camera system, raising concerns that data will be shared with immigration authorities and other federal agencies at a time when mass surveillance is growing across the country with little regard for individual rights.
The Flock network, supported by the Oakland Police Department, has the backing of residents and councilmembers who see it as an important tool to protect public safety.
“This system makes the Department more efficient as it allows for information related to disruptive/violent criminal activities to be captured … and allows for precise and focused enforcement,” OPD wrote in its proposal to City Council.
According to OPD, police made 232 arrests using data from Flock cameras between July 2024 and November of this year.
Based on the data, police say they recovered 68 guns, and utilizing the countywide system, they have found 1,100 stolen vehicles.
However, Flock’s cameras cast a wide net. The company’s cameras in Oakland last month captured license plate numbers and other information from about 1.4 million vehicles.
Speaking at Tuesday’s Council meeting, Fife was critical of her colleagues for signing a contract with a company that has been in the national spotlight for sharing data with federal agencies.
Flock’s cameras – which are automated license plate readers – have been used in tracking people who have had abortions, monitoring protesters, and aiding in deportation roundups.
“I don’t know how we get up and have several press conferences talking about how we are supportive of a sanctuary city status but then use a vendor that has been shown to have a direct relationship with (the U.S.) Border Control,” she said. “It doesn’t make sense to me.”
Several councilmembers who voted in favor of the contract said they supported the deal as long as some safeguards were written into the Council’s resolution.
“We’re not aiming for perfection,” said District 1 Councilmember Zac Unger. “This is not Orwellian facial recognition technology — that’s prohibited in Oakland. The road forward here is to add as many amendments as we can.”
Amendments passed by the Council prohibit OPD from sharing camera data with any other agencies for the purpose of “criminalizing reproductive or gender affirming healthcare” or for federal immigration enforcement. California state law also prohibits the sharing of license plate reader data with the federal government, and because Oakland’s sanctuary city status, OPD is not allowed to cooperate with immigration authorities.
A former member of Oakland’s Privacy Advisory Commission has sued OPD, alleging that it has violated its own rules around data sharing.
So far, OPD has shared Flock data with 50 other law enforcement agencies.
-
Activism4 weeks agoDesmond Gumbs — Visionary Founder, Mentor, and Builder of Opportunity
-
Activism4 weeks agoFamilies Across the U.S. Are Facing an ‘Affordability Crisis,’ Says United Way Bay Area
-
Alameda County4 weeks agoOakland Council Expands Citywide Security Cameras Despite Major Opposition
-
Alameda County4 weeks agoBling It On: Holiday Lights Brighten Dark Nights All Around the Bay
-
Activism4 weeks agoBlack Arts Movement Business District Named New Cultural District in California
-
Activism4 weeks agoLu Lu’s House is Not Just Toying Around with the Community
-
Activism4 weeks agoOakland Post: Week of December 17 – 23, 2025
-
Black History3 weeks agoAlfred Cralle: Inventor of the Ice Cream Scoop




