Connect with us

Bay Area

Oakland Environmental Justice Advocates Want a Seat at the Table to Fight For Healthy Neighborhoods

The proposed widening of the turning basin at the Port of Oakland is intended to accommodate 1,300-foot “megaships” carrying shipping containers and cargo into the harbor instead of the already large 1,300-foot ships that are currently coming in daily to the Port. The Port claims that the widening will decrease in-harbor transit time, transit emissions, and transportation costs, while increasing safety.

Published

on

“It’s a matter of economics,” Port of Oakland Maritime Director John Driscoll said in a statement in 2019. “By loading more cargo on bigger ships, the shipping lines can actually reduce the number of vessels they deploy.” However, legal organizations argue activity from the Port emissions represent some of the largest share of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions in the west part of the city, specifically from drayage trucks, cargo handling equipment, ships and more.
“It’s a matter of economics,” Port of Oakland Maritime Director John Driscoll said in a statement in 2019. “By loading more cargo on bigger ships, the shipping lines can actually reduce the number of vessels they deploy.” However, legal organizations argue activity from the Port emissions represent some of the largest share of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions in the west part of the city, specifically from drayage trucks, cargo handling equipment, ships and more.

By Magaly Muñoz

The proposed widening of the turning basin at the Port of Oakland is intended to accommodate 1,300-foot “megaships” carrying shipping containers and cargo into the harbor instead of the already large 1,300-foot ships that are currently coming in daily to the Port.

The Port claims that the widening will decrease in-harbor transit time, transit emissions, and transportation costs, while increasing safety.

“It’s a matter of economics,” Port of Oakland Maritime Director John Driscoll said in a statement in 2019. “By loading more cargo on bigger ships, the shipping lines can actually reduce the number of vessels they deploy.”

However, legal organizations argue activity from the Port emissions represent some of the largest share of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions in the west part of the city, specifically from drayage trucks, cargo handling equipment, ships and more.

Increased traffic congestion from more trucks coming and going to load more cargo will also add to the pollution breathed in by people in neighborhoods surrounded by major interstate highways.

EarthJustice and concerned residents are urging the Port to prioritize zero-emission equipment over increasing truck traffic that is harming the local environment and residents.

“Our position is not that the Port shouldn’t operate as a business, but that it shouldn’t do that at the expense of the West Oakland community, particularly when it comes to public health and air quality concerns, and this sort of project, expanding the turning basin, seems like it will,” EarthJustice attorneys said.

According to California law, drayage trucks at ports began implementing zero-emission technology this year, with full implementation by 2035.

The Port of Oakland has acquired several battery electric trucks and are working toward cleaner equipment, but officials acknowledge that it will take time and resources.

Less than 10 miles from the Port, another project, the addition of new terminals at the Oakland International Airport, is causing distress to activists and workers.

An estimated 174 people per 10,000 living directly around the airport visited the emergency department for asthma, according to CalEnviroScreen.

Emissions from passenger flights at OAK are equivalent to the yearly emissions from 1,200,000 cars, according to Airport Tracker.

Advocates argue that airlines are failing to meet climate goals, meaning expansions should come to a halt until technological solutions are available for greener air traffic at current demand.

Among the most negatively impacted people from the airport are those working there day and night.

Juana, a cabin cleaner at OAK, told The Post that she contracted asthma soon after starting her job, and due to low wages and no health insurance, she cannot pay for her needed medication.

“Working there is a negative exposure to your life, to your health, to everything,” Juana said.

As a cabin cleaner, she and three other workers have to sanitize and clean the inside of the airplane cabins as soon as passengers deboard the aircraft. The work can be back-breaking and often they are exposed directly to the pollution of the plane since they are made to stand in the terminal waiting for the craft to arrive.

Juana explained that her employer does not give workers ample time off to rest and recover from the harmful effects of working at the airport. She said when people brought concerns about the conditions, they were met with hostility and told to walk out if they didn’t like being there.

Not many have walked out, Juana admitted.

Juana said the airport and third-party companies, like her employer, are aware that people in the community are desperate for jobs and are essentially exploiting them with difficult work and little pay.

She is worried that the terminal expansion will double the work for her and her colleagues, with no increase in pay, and more exposure to the troubling health conditions the job leaves people with. Additionally, since OAK is not required to offer health insurance to workers, their current health problems will only be exacerbated with time.

Collaboration with the Port

Environmental justice activists agree that while all their needs have not been met, and there is a long way to go before they do, they do have the ear of some Port Commissioners.

Michael Colbruno, a Board member since 2013, considers himself an environmentalist, which activists say is not quite an environmental justice advocate, but close enough.

Colbruno has opened up the dialogue and access to the decision makers by organizing an informal meeting he conducts to gather community input on Port projects.

These meetings have resulted in more funding from grants, better awareness of what environmental concerns might arise from future agenda items, and the Port’s participation in the Green Marine Program. The program helps its participants improve their environmental performance beyond regulations and targets key environmental issues related to biodiversity protection and air, water, and soil quality.

Colbruno acknowledged that there are problems with some of the projects the Port is working on, but the city has to find a way to keep growing so that they do not lose out on economic opportunities.

“The goal, then, is to try to do [projects] as cleanly and sustainably as possible, and to put the pieces in place that make it have the least environmental impact for the community. You can’t have that kind of a project with zero environmental impact. It’s impossible,” Colbruno said.

While activists appreciate the opportunity to talk with Colbruno, they are demanding a long-overdue seat at the Port of Oakland Commissioner table for someone like Gordon, who has dealt with the harsh realities of living in these frontline communities impacted by the polluted environment.

Activists intend to push for more representation from the mayor as more Board seats open up in the coming years.

“I think that’s a valuable thing, having somebody that really understands firsthand experience…someone that has proper expertise,” Fleck said.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of May 21 – 27, 2025

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of May 21 – 27, 2025

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Bay Area

Chevron Richmond Installs Baker Hughes Flare.IQ, Real-time Flare Monitoring, Control and Reduction System

While the sight of flaring can cause concern in the community, flares are essential safety systems that burn pollutants to prevent them from being released directly into the atmosphere. They activate during startup and shut-down of facility units or during upsets or equipment malfunctions. The typical flare stack is about 200 feet high so that vapors are well above street levels.

Published

on

Image courtesy The Richmond Standard.
Image courtesy The Richmond Standard.

The Richmond Standard

Chevron Richmond recently installed flare.IQ, a real-time, automated system that will improve the facility’s flaring performance.

The technology, developed by Panametrics, a Baker Hughes business, uses sensors to monitor, reduce and control flaring in real time. It collects and assesses data on refinery processes, such as temperature, pressure, gas flow and gas composition, and adjusts accordingly to ensure flares burn more efficiently and cleanly, leading to fewer emissions.

“The cleaner the flare, the brighter the flame can look,” said Duy Nguyen, a Chevron Richmond flaring specialist. “If you see a brighter flame than usual on a flare, that actually means flare.IQ is operating as intended.”

While the sight of flaring can cause concern in the community, flares are essential safety systems that burn pollutants to prevent them from being released directly into the atmosphere. They activate during startup and shut-down of facility units or during upsets or equipment malfunctions. The typical flare stack is about 200 feet high so that vapors are well above street levels.

“A key element in Baker Hughes’ emissions abatement portfolio, flare.IQ has a proven track record in optimizing flare operations and significantly reducing emissions,” said Colin Hehir, vice president of Panametrics, a Baker Hughes business. “By partnering with Chevron Richmond, one of the first operators in North America to adopt flare.IQ, we are looking forward to enhancing the plant’s flaring operations.”

The installation of flare.IQ is part of a broader and ongoing effort by Chevron Richmond to improve flare performance, particularly in response to increased events after the new, more efficient hydrogen plant was brought online in 2019.

Since then, the company has invested $25 million — and counting — into flare minimization. As part of the effort, a multidisciplinary refinery team was formed to find and implement ways to improve operational reliability and ultimately reduce flaring. Operators and other employees involved in management of flares and flare gas recovery systems undergo new training.

“It is important to me that the community knows we are working hard to lower emissions and improve our flaring performance,” Nguyen said.

Also evolving is the process by which community members are notified of flaring incidents. The Community Warning System (CWS), operated by Contra Costa County is an “all-hazard” public warning system.

Residents can opt-in to receive alerts via text, e-mail and landline. The CWS was recently expanded to enable residents to receive notifications for “Level 1” incidents, which are considered informational as they do not require any community action.

For more information related to these topics, check out the resources included on the Chevron RichmondCAER and  Contra Costa Health websites. Residents are also encouraged to follow @chevronrichmond and @RFDCAOnline on Facebook and X (formerly Twitter), where additional information may be posted during an incident.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Hosts Town Hall Addressing Lead Hazards in City Housing

According to the city, there are 22,000 households in need of services for lead issues, most in predominantly low-income or Black and Latino neighborhoods, but only 550 to 600 homes are addressed every year. The city is hoping to use part of the multimillion-dollar settlement to increase the number of households served each year.

Published

on

iStock.
iStock.

By Magaly Muñoz

The City of Oakland’s Housing and Community Development Department hosted a town hall in the Fruitvale to discuss the efforts being undertaken to remove lead primarily found in housing in East and West Oakland.

In 2021, the city was awarded $14 million out of a $24 million legal settlement from a lawsuit against paint distributors for selling lead-based paint that has affected hundreds of families in Oakland and Alameda County. The funding is intended to be used for lead poisoning reduction and prevention services in paint only, not water or other sources as has been found recently in schools across the city.

The settlement can be used for developing or enhancing programs that abate lead-based paint, providing services to individuals, particularly exposed children, educating the public about hazards caused by lead paint, and covering attorney’s fees incurred in pursuing litigation.

According to the city, there are 22,000 households in need of services for lead issues, most in predominantly low-income or Black and Latino neighborhoods, but only 550 to 600 homes are addressed every year. The city is hoping to use part of the multimillion-dollar settlement to increase the number of households served each year.

Most of the homes affected were built prior to 1978, and 12,000 of these homes are considered to be at high risk for lead poisoning.

City councilmember Noel Gallo, who represents a few of the lead-affected Census tracts, said the majority of the poisoned kids and families are coming directly from neighborhoods like the Fruitvale.

“When you look at the [kids being admitted] at the children’s hospital, they’re coming from this community,” Gallo said at the town hall.

In order to eventually rid the highest impacted homes of lead poisoning, the city intends to create programs and activities such as lead-based paint inspections and assessments, full abatement designed to permanently eliminate lead-based paint, or partial abatement for repairs, painting, and specialized cleaning meant for temporary reduction of hazards.

In feedback for what the city could implement in their programming, residents in attendance of the event said they want more accessibility to resources, like blood testing, and information from officials about lead poisoning symptoms, hotlines for assistance, and updates on the reduction of lead in their communities.

Attendees also asked how they’d know where they are on the prioritization list and what would be done to address lead in the water found at several school sites in Oakland last year.

City staff said there will be a follow-up event to gather more community input for programming in August, with finalizations happening in the fall and a pilot launch in early 2026.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.