City Government
OP-ED: Oakland Poised to Lead in Protecting Privacy Rights
By Brian Hofer and JP Massar
Here in Oakland we have no citywide privacy policy, no privacy or data-retention policies for use of surveillance equipment, and no policy concerning the use of the Oakland Police Department’s cellphone tower-mimicking Stingray devices.
These are so controversial that police across the nation actively conceal their use from courts and defense attorneys, going so far as to dismiss charges at trial rather than reveal the technology (“Judge threatens detective with contempt…,” Baltimore Sun, Nov. 17, 2014). And yet, neither the purchase of Stingrays nor their use has ever been knowingly approved by the City Council.
On May 12, the Oakland City Council’s Public Safety Committee is poised to vote on recommendations created by the Ad Hoc Privacy Committee that they established a year ago.
Councilmembers will consider a privacy and data retention policy for the scaled back Port Domain Awareness Center (DAC), and is also being asked to establish a new, permanent committee to advise the council on broad privacy and data-related matters. This will in turn create a citywide privacy policy.
A proposal to adopt a first-of-its-kind surveillance equipment ordinance has also been made.
If adopted, these recommendations will ensure that there is robust public debate on privacy issues before council approval of future surveillance projects, and that the effectiveness of surveillance tools be analyzed, reported publicly and undergo independent audits.
Once passed by the full council, these will significantly protect the right to privacy for residents in this age of big data and Mass Surveillance.
Taken as a whole, the implementation of the committee’s recommendations would make Oakland the national leader in protecting privacy rights. Other cities are pursuing a similar path.
Seattle has created a permanent privacy committee and adopted a surveillance equipment ordinance. Menlo Park recently adopted an ordinance that regulates the use of automated license plate readers and requires quarterly performance reports.
San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos and Santa Clara Supervisor Joe Simitian are working with the ACLU to introduce in their jurisdictions the same type of surveillance equipment ordinance to be introduced here.
The Los Angeles Times endorsed the ACLU’s ordinance, stating: “The ACLU’s approach to vetting new technologies is so pragmatic that cities, counties and law enforcement agencies throughout California would be foolish not to embrace it.”
With the adoption of these recommendations as written, the Oakland City Council can show it is earnest about protecting its citizens’ privacy rights. By supporting their full implementation, city staff and law enforcement can demonstrate that they intend to earn the community’s trust by operating within the bounds of the Constitution, city policy and civilian oversight. As the Los Angeles Times editorialized, “trust us is not enough.”
Without active citizens coming together to “watch the watchers,” history shows that legislation alone is insufficient.
The Oakland Privacy Working Group is one such group. Formed two years ago to stand up for privacy in Oakland, it has attempted to keep city officials honest – fighting against the DAC and initiating a number of Public Records Requests to shed light on surveillance contracts, influence of surveillance contractors, and use of surveillance equipment.
Find them at oaklandprivacy.wordpress.com and on Twitter: @oaklandprivacy.
Brian Hofer is chair of the Ad Hoc Privacy Committee. JP Massar is a member of the Oakland Privacy Working Group.
By Brian Hofer and JP Massar
Here in Oakland we have no citywide privacy policy, no privacy or data-retention policies for use of surveillance equipment, and no policy concerning the use of the Oakland Police Department’s cellphone tower-mimicking Stingray devices.
These are so controversial that police across the nation actively conceal their use from courts and defense attorneys, going so far as to dismiss charges at trial rather than reveal the technology (“Judge threatens detective with contempt…,” Baltimore Sun, Nov. 17, 2014). And yet, neither the purchase of Stingrays nor their use has ever been knowingly approved by the City Council.
On May 12, the Oakland City Council’s Public Safety Committee is poised to vote on recommendations created by the Ad Hoc Privacy Committee that they established a year ago.
Councilmembers will consider a privacy and data retention policy for the scaled back Port Domain Awareness Center (DAC), and is also being asked to establish a new, permanent committee to advise the council on broad privacy and data-related matters. This will in turn create a citywide privacy policy.
A proposal to adopt a first-of-its-kind surveillance equipment ordinance has also been made.
If adopted, these recommendations will ensure that there is robust public debate on privacy issues before council approval of future surveillance projects, and that the effectiveness of surveillance tools be analyzed, reported publicly and undergo independent audits.
Once passed by the full council, these will significantly protect the right to privacy for residents in this age of big data and Mass Surveillance.
Taken as a whole, the implementation of the committee’s recommendations would make Oakland the national leader in protecting privacy rights. Other cities are pursuing a similar path.
Seattle has created a permanent privacy committee and adopted a surveillance equipment ordinance. Menlo Park recently adopted an ordinance that regulates the use of automated license plate readers and requires quarterly performance reports.
San Francisco Supervisor John Avalos and Santa Clara Supervisor Joe Simitian are working with the ACLU to introduce in their jurisdictions the same type of surveillance equipment ordinance to be introduced here.
The Los Angeles Times endorsed the ACLU’s ordinance, stating: “The ACLU’s approach to vetting new technologies is so pragmatic that cities, counties and law enforcement agencies throughout California would be foolish not to embrace it.”
With the adoption of these recommendations as written, the Oakland City Council can show it is earnest about protecting its citizens’ privacy rights. By supporting their full implementation, city staff and law enforcement can demonstrate that they intend to earn the community’s trust by operating within the bounds of the Constitution, city policy and civilian oversight. As the Los Angeles Times editorialized, “trust us is not enough.”
Without active citizens coming together to “watch the watchers,” history shows that legislation alone is insufficient.
The Oakland Privacy Working Group is one such group. Formed two years ago to stand up for privacy in Oakland, it has attempted to keep city officials honest – fighting against the DAC and initiating a number of Public Records Requests to shed light on surveillance contracts, influence of surveillance contractors, and use of surveillance equipment.
Find them at oaklandprivacy.wordpress.com and on Twitter: @oaklandprivacy.
Brian Hofer is chair of the Ad Hoc Privacy Committee. JP Massar is a member of the Oakland Privacy Working Group.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of March 28 – April 1, 2025
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of March 28 – April 1, 2025

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Bay Area
Five Years After COVID-19 Began, a Struggling Child Care Workforce Faces New Threats
Five years ago, as COVID-19 lockdowns and school closures began, most early educators continued to work in person, risking their own health and that of their families. “Early educators were called essential, but they weren’t provided with the personal protective equipment they needed to stay safe,” said CSCCE Executive Director Lea Austin. “There were no special shopping hours or ways for them to access safety materials in those early and scary months of the pandemic, leaving them to compete with other shoppers. One state even advised them to wear trash bags if they couldn’t find PPE.”

UC Berkeley News
In the first eight months of the COVID-19 pandemic alone, 166,000 childcare jobs were lost across the nation. Significant recovery didn’t begin until the advent of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Child Care Stabilization funds in April 2021.
Today, child care employment is back to slightly above pre-pandemic levels, but job growth has remained sluggish at 1.4% since ARPA funding allocations ended in October 2023, according to analysis by the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment (CSCCE) at UC Berkeley. In the last six months, childcare employment has hovered around 1.1 million.
Yet more than two million American parents report job changes due to problems accessing child care. Why does the childcare sector continue to face a workforce crisis that has predated the pandemic? Inadequate compensation drives high turnover rates and workforce shortages that predate the pandemic. Early childhood educators are skilled professionals; many have more than 15 years of experience and a college degree, but their compensation does not reflect their expertise. The national median hourly wage is $13.07, and only a small proportion of early educators receive benefits.
And now a new round of challenges is about to hit childcare. The low wages paid in early care and education result in 43% of early educator families depending on at least one public support program, such as Medicaid or food stamps, both of which are threatened by potential federal funding cuts. Job numbers will likely fall as many early childhood educators need to find jobs with healthcare benefits or better pay.
In addition, one in five child care workers are immigrants, and executive orders driving deportation and ICE raids will further devastate the entire early care and education system. These stresses are part of the historical lack of respect the workforce faces, despite all they contribute to children, families, and the economy.
Five years ago, as COVID-19 lockdowns and school closures began, most early educators continued to work in person, risking their own health and that of their families. “Early educators were called essential, but they weren’t provided with the personal protective equipment they needed to stay safe,” said CSCCE Executive Director Lea Austin. “There were no special shopping hours or ways for them to access safety materials in those early and scary months of the pandemic, leaving them to compete with other shoppers. One state even advised them to wear trash bags if they couldn’t find PPE.”
The economic impact was equally dire. Even as many providers tried to remain open to ensure their financial security, the combination of higher costs to meet safety protocols and lower revenue from fewer children enrolled led to job losses, increased debt, and program closures.
Eventually, the federal government responded with historic short-term investments through ARPA, which stabilized childcare programs. These funds provided money to increase pay or provide financial relief to early educators to improve their income and well-being. The childcare sector began to slowly recover. Larger job gains were made in 2022 and 2023, and as of November 2023, national job numbers had slightly surpassed pre-pandemic levels, though state and metro areas continued to fluctuate.
Many states have continued to support the workforce after ARPA funding expired in late 2024. In Maine, a salary supplement initiative has provided monthly stipends of $240-$540 to educators working in licensed home- or center-based care, based on education and experience, making it one of the nation’s leaders in its support of early educators. Early educators say the program has enabled them to raise wages, which has improved staff retention. Yet now, Governor Janet Mills is considering cutting the stipend program in half.
“History shows that once an emergency is perceived to have passed, public funding that supports the early care and education workforce is pulled,” says Austin. “You can’t build a stable childcare workforce and system without consistent public investment and respect for all that early educators contribute.”
The Center for the Study of Childcare Employment is the source of this story.
Activism
We Fought on Opposite Sides of the Sheng Thao Recall. Here’s Why We’re Uniting Behind Barbara Lee for Oakland Mayor
Today, we are coming together to do all we can to make sure Barbara Lee is elected Mayor in the April 15 Oakland special election. Here’s why. Now more than ever, Oakland needs a respected, hands-on leader who will unite residents behind a clear vision for change. The next mayor will have to hit the ground running with leaders and stakeholders across our political divide to get to work solving the problems standing in the way of Oakland’s progress. Job No. 1: improving public safety. Everyone agrees that all Oaklanders deserve to feel safe in their neighborhoods. But sadly, too many of us do not.

By Robert Harris and Richard Fuentes
Special to The Post
The City of Oakland is facing a number of urgent challenges, from housing and public safety to a pressing need for jobs and economic development. One of us, Robert Harris, supported the November recall vote that removed Mayor Sheng Thao from office. Meanwhile, Richard Fuentes believed the recall was the wrong strategy to tackle Oakland’s challenges.
Today, we are coming together to do all we can to make sure Barbara Lee is elected Mayor in the April 15 Oakland special election. Here’s why.
Now more than ever, Oakland needs a respected, hands-on leader who will unite residents behind a clear vision for change.
The next mayor will have to hit the ground running with leaders and stakeholders across our political divide to get to work solving the problems standing in the way of Oakland’s progress.
Job No. 1: improving public safety. Everyone agrees that all Oaklanders deserve to feel safe in their neighborhoods. But sadly, too many of us do not.
During her three decades in the state Legislature and Congress, Lee made public safety a priority, securing funding for police and firefighters in Oakland, delivering $15.8 million in community safety funding, and more. Today, she has a plan for making Oakland safer. It starts with making sure police are resourced, ready, and on patrol to stop the most dangerous criminals on our streets.
Oakland residents and business owners are feeling the impact of too many assaults, smash/grabs, retail thefts, and home robberies. Lee will increase the number of police on the streets, make sure they are focused on the biggest threats, and invest in violence prevention and proven alternatives that prevent crime and violence in the first place.
In addition, on day one, Barbara Lee will focus on Oakland’s business community, creating an advisory cabinet of business owners and pushing to ensure Oakland can attract and keep businesses of all sizes.
The other top issue facing Oakland is housing and homelessness. As of May 2024, over 5,500 people were unhoused in the city. Oaklanders are just 25% of the population of Alameda County, but the city has 57% of the unhoused population.
Unhoused people include seniors, veterans, single women, women with children, people who suffer physical and mental illness, unemployed and undereducated people, and individuals addicted to drugs. Some are students under 18 living on the streets without their parents or a guardian. Research shows that 53% of Oakland’s homeless population is Black.
Starting on her first day in office, Lee will use her national profile and experience to bring new resources to the city to reduce homelessness and expand affordable housing. And she will forge new public/private partnerships and collaboration between the City, Alameda County, other public agencies, and local nonprofits to ensure that Oakland gets its fair share of resources for everything from supportive services to affordable housing.
Besides a public safety and housing crisis, Oakland has a reputational crisis at hand. Too many people locally and nationally believe Oakland does not have the ability to tackle its problems.
Lee has the national reputation and the relationships she can use to assert a new narrative about our beloved Oakland – a vibrant, diverse, and culturally rich city with a deep history of activism and innovation.
Everyone remembers how Lee stood up for Oakland values as the only member of Congress not to authorize the disastrous Iraq War in 2001. She has led the fight in Congress for ethics reform and changes to the nation’s pay-to-play campaign finance laws.
Lee stands alone among the candidates for mayor as a longtime champion of honest, transparent, and accountable government—and she has the reputation and the skills to lead an Oakland transformation that puts people first.
The past few years have been a trying period for our hometown.
Robert Harris supported the recall because of Thao’s decision to fire LeRonne Armstrong; her refusal to meet with certain organizations, such as the Oakland Branch of the NAACP; and the city missing the deadline for filing for a state grant to deal with serious retail thefts in Oakland.
Richard Fuentes opposed the recall, believing that Oakland was making progress in reducing crime. The voters have had their say; now, it is time for us to move forward together and turn the page to a new era.
The two of us don’t agree on everything, but we agree on this: the next few years will be safer, stronger, and more prosperous if Oaklanders elect Barbara Lee as our next mayor on April 15.
Robert Harris is a retired attorney at PG&E and former legal counsel for NAACP.
Richard Fuentes is co-owner of FLUID510 and chair of the Political Action Committee, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 57.
-
#NNPA BlackPress4 weeks ago
Target Takes a Hit: $12.4 Billion Wiped Out as Boycotts Grow
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Undocumented Workers Are Struggling to Feed Themselves. Slashed Budgets and New Immigration Policies Bring Fresh Challenges
-
Arts and Culture4 weeks ago
Beverly Lorraine Greene: A Pioneering Architect and Symbol of Possibility and Progress
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Oakland Post: Week of March 5 – 11, 2025
-
#NNPA BlackPress2 weeks ago
Rev. Dr. Jamal Bryant’s Black Church Target Boycott Mobilizes 150,000
-
Activism1 week ago
We Fought on Opposite Sides of the Sheng Thao Recall. Here’s Why We’re Uniting Behind Barbara Lee for Oakland Mayor
-
#NNPA BlackPress4 weeks ago
Trump Moves to Dismantle Education Department
-
#NNPA BlackPress4 weeks ago
Fighting to Keep Blackness