City Government
Opinion: Redevelopment of Henry J. Kaiser Center Must Not Ignore Community Voices
The Henry J. Kaiser (HJK) Convention Center redevelopment proposal is being fast-tracked by the city despite significant community concerns—including lack of affordability, an operational model developed without significant community input, exclusion of communities of color from required public input processes, and undefined local access.
A coalition of community stakeholders led by the Black Arts Movement Business District (BAMBD) Community Development Corporation has filed an appeal to the granting of a Major Conditional Use permit, citing violations of the Request For Proposals, but the City continues to attempt to advance the project prior to the appeal being heard.
The HJK site is one of Oakland’s last remaining public assets, as well as a historical cultural institution. Granting a 99-year lease with insufficient community benefits and insufficient access for local artists will only reinforce existing inequities and lead to more displacement of artists of color— missing a major opportunity to implement and align equity-focused strategies and recommendations developed by the Mayor’s Task Force on Artists and Workspaces, the Cultural Plan, and the Downtown Specific Plan Preliminary Draft.
The task force surveyed more than 900 artists and found that 49 percent had experienced displacement from their homes or workspaces, and most were at risk of displacement due to rising rents. In its report, it concluded “this data suggests that now is the time to establish more robust policies to support artists in Oakland, before displacement worsens.”
That was in 2016; displacement has, in fact, worsened. The City’s 2018 Downtown Disparity analysis states “most of greater downtown Oakland is experiencing ongoing gentrification and displacement,“ while its 2018 Equity Indicators report assigned Oakland a score of 33 out of 100—a failing grade.
In 2019, income inequality, homelessness, and lack of affordable housing have all reached crisis levels. There should be an urgent need for Oakland to implement equity across city departments, as specifically mandated by Oakland’s Municipal Code, which states, “The City of Oakland will intentionally integrate, on a citywide basis, the principle of ‘fair and just’ in all the city does in order to achieve equitable opportunities for all people and communities.”
The best argument for reframing the HJK redevelopment around equity principles can be found in the city’s own language. The task force report calls for “Incentiviz(ing) private developers to provide permanently or long-term affordable artist spaces in mixed-use developments,” while the HJK RFP notes, “The city is eager to see as many community benefits as possible derived from the project.”
The Lake Merritt Station Area Plan calls for “community development that is equitable, sustainable, and healthy” and maintains that “(community) benefits must clearly be reflective of the community’s needs and desires.” The Cultural Plan establishes a framework of “Cultural Equity”; and the Downtown Plan identifies community benefit agreements as a vehicle for equitable development.
The HJK site redevelopment must align with these policy guidelines for equity. It must not contribute to further displacement of EastLake, Chinatown and BAMBD businesses, residents, artists, art organizations, and nonprofits. It must reflect a community engagement process which does not exclude neighborhood stakeholders and artists of color.
The City Council has the authority to insist that the highest possible level of community benefit be derived from the HJK site. It also has an obligation to redress historical inequities by creating pathways to social equity, economic sustainability and cultural preservation for communities of color — as stipulated in section 2.29.170 of Oakland’s Municipal Code. The current Council must uphold this credo and ensure that equity isn’t just lip service, but tangible and intersectional policy to mitigate displacement and income gaps.
Eric Arnold is the co-director of BAMBD CDC and a former equity consultant for the City of Oakland’s Downtown Specific Plan.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of December 31, 2025 – January 6, 2026
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 31, 2025 – January 6, 2026
To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of December 24 – 30, 2025
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 24 – 30, 2025
To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Alameda County
Oakland Council Expands Citywide Security Cameras Despite Major Opposition
In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”
By Post Staff
The Oakland City Council this week approved a $2.25 million contract with Flock Safety for a mass surveillance network of hundreds of security cameras to track vehicles in the city.
In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”
In recent weeks hundreds of local residents have spoken against the camera system, raising concerns that data will be shared with immigration authorities and other federal agencies at a time when mass surveillance is growing across the country with little regard for individual rights.
The Flock network, supported by the Oakland Police Department, has the backing of residents and councilmembers who see it as an important tool to protect public safety.
“This system makes the Department more efficient as it allows for information related to disruptive/violent criminal activities to be captured … and allows for precise and focused enforcement,” OPD wrote in its proposal to City Council.
According to OPD, police made 232 arrests using data from Flock cameras between July 2024 and November of this year.
Based on the data, police say they recovered 68 guns, and utilizing the countywide system, they have found 1,100 stolen vehicles.
However, Flock’s cameras cast a wide net. The company’s cameras in Oakland last month captured license plate numbers and other information from about 1.4 million vehicles.
Speaking at Tuesday’s Council meeting, Fife was critical of her colleagues for signing a contract with a company that has been in the national spotlight for sharing data with federal agencies.
Flock’s cameras – which are automated license plate readers – have been used in tracking people who have had abortions, monitoring protesters, and aiding in deportation roundups.
“I don’t know how we get up and have several press conferences talking about how we are supportive of a sanctuary city status but then use a vendor that has been shown to have a direct relationship with (the U.S.) Border Control,” she said. “It doesn’t make sense to me.”
Several councilmembers who voted in favor of the contract said they supported the deal as long as some safeguards were written into the Council’s resolution.
“We’re not aiming for perfection,” said District 1 Councilmember Zac Unger. “This is not Orwellian facial recognition technology — that’s prohibited in Oakland. The road forward here is to add as many amendments as we can.”
Amendments passed by the Council prohibit OPD from sharing camera data with any other agencies for the purpose of “criminalizing reproductive or gender affirming healthcare” or for federal immigration enforcement. California state law also prohibits the sharing of license plate reader data with the federal government, and because Oakland’s sanctuary city status, OPD is not allowed to cooperate with immigration authorities.
A former member of Oakland’s Privacy Advisory Commission has sued OPD, alleging that it has violated its own rules around data sharing.
So far, OPD has shared Flock data with 50 other law enforcement agencies.
-
Bay Area3 weeks agoPost Salon to Discuss Proposal to Bring Costco to Oakland Community meeting to be held at City Hall, Thursday, Dec. 18
-
Activism3 weeks agoMayor Lee, City Leaders Announce $334 Million Bond Sale for Affordable Housing, Roads, Park Renovations, Libraries and Senior Centers
-
Activism3 weeks agoOakland Post: Week of December 10 – 16, 2025
-
Activism3 weeks agoOakland School Board Grapples with Potential $100 Million Shortfall Next Year
-
Arts and Culture3 weeks agoFayeth Gardens Holds 3rd Annual Kwanzaa Celebration at Hayward City Hall on Dec. 28
-
Activism3 weeks ago2025 in Review: Seven Questions for Black Women’s Think Tank Founder Kellie Todd Griffin
-
Advice3 weeks agoCOMMENTARY: If You Don’t Want Your ‘Black Card’ Revoked, Watch What You Bring to Holiday Dinners
-
Activism3 weeks agoAnn Lowe: The Quiet Genius of American Couture





