Community
Opinion: Seize The Time

In 2016, Oakland overwhelmingly voted for a police commission they believed would create an “independent” oversight body of the Oakland Police Department (OPD). After years of local organizations led by those most impacted by police violence sounding the alarm about the violence and corruption of OPD, Oakland was ready for change.
As Measure LL was being shaped, numerous community organizations were explicit about demands required for the commission to earn its title of “independent”; most crucial was that the commission be independent of the Mayor and City Administration. Those demands were ignored. What Oakland received was a measure significantly watered down and highly ineffective.
This September, City Council will vote on a legislative rewrite, which can strengthen the Commission by removing forced concessions made the first time. We have a chance with the new progressive City Council, and with the support of united community groups on the front lines of combating police violence, to make this an independent community controlled commission. In March, you will have an opportunity to vote on a rewritten measure which will give effective oversight of OPD — that is IF we listen to the voices of the most impacted community members and who are the experts on best practices regarding police accountability and independent oversight.
Power Never Concedes Without Demand
When Measure LL was being written and finalized, there were many public and private conversations about compromises that disregarded the demands from community groups working on the ground and from survivors of police violence. Impacted communities were told that something was better than nothing and to trust those behind closed doors. Under normal circumstances, they may have been right that the compromise of giving the Mayor and City Hall the controlling interest may have been the best that we could do. But this process was not happening under normal circumstances.
OPD was embroiled in a rape crisis involving a minor, the mayor seemed inept to fix it, activists were in the streets, national eyes were on Oakland and the community was incensed. This was precisely the moment to push for the most progressive, radical (rational) version of accountability through an independent police commission that our community needed.
When discussed at the City Council meeting in July 2016, over 50 people representing dozens of organizations spoke out against the deeply NON INDEPENDENT version being voted on.Yet, despite great efforts from community (and at least two City Council members), a measure went to voters offering a commission run by the same City Hall that has run a police department stuck in federal receivership for 16 years.
APTP has engaged in significant research about what a competent and truly independent police commission should look like.
Here are our primary demands:
– All seats appointed by the community (no mayoral appointments.)
– Remove all oversight of this commission and CPRA by the city administrator.
– Include broad based community input ad expertise when creating policies and procedures for OPD.
– Increase funding for CPRA and the commission to no less than 5 percent of OPD’s budget.
*For a full list of demands, visit www.antipoliceterrorproject.org
The lives of Oaklanders depend on a police commission that can hold OPD accountable, force accountability and usher in transformation.
Your voices are critical. Community Meetings are taking place. City Council Discussions are happening. Get involved. Contact your councilmembers. Tell them you want what you thought you voted for in the first place: A truly independent Police Commission with the teeth to force radical (rational) reform.
Cat Brooks has over 20 years of community organizing experience. She is the Executive Director of The Justice Teams Network, Co-founder of the Anti Police-Terror Project, Co-host of UpFront on KPFA, an actress and playwright.
Maureen Benson is a former police commissioner, and has served in Oakland for 20 years as an educator, activist, organizer and strategist.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of April 16 – 22, 2025
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of April 16 – 22, 2025

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
#NNPA BlackPress
UPDATE: PepsiCo Meets with Sharpton Over DEI Rollbacks, Future Action Pending
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — The more than hour-long meeting included PepsiCo Chairman Ramon Laguarta and Steven Williams, CEO of PepsiCo North America, and was held within the 21-day window Sharpton had given the company to respond.

By Stacy M. Brown
BlackPressUSA.com Senior National Correspondent
Rev. Al Sharpton met Tuesday morning with PepsiCo leadership at the company’s global headquarters in Purchase, New York, following sharp criticism of the food and beverage giant’s decision to scale back nearly $500 million in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. The more than hour-long meeting included PepsiCo Chairman Ramon Laguarta and Steven Williams, CEO of PepsiCo North America, and was held within the 21-day window Sharpton had given the company to respond. Sharpton was joined by members of the National Action Network (NAN), the civil rights organization he founded and leads. “It was a constructive conversation,” Sharpton said after the meeting. “We agreed to follow up meetings within the next few days. After that continued dialogue, NAN Chairman Dr. W. Franklyn Richardson and I, both former members of the company’s African American Advisory Board, will make a final determination and recommendation to the organization on what we will do around PepsiCo moving forward, as we continue to deal with a broader swath of corporations with whom we will either boycott or buy-cott.”
Sharpton initially raised concerns in an April 4 letter to Laguarta, accusing the company of abandoning its equity commitments and threatening a boycott if PepsiCo did not meet within three weeks. PepsiCo announced in February that it would no longer maintain specific goals for minority representation in its management or among its suppliers — a move that drew criticism from civil rights advocates. “You have walked away from equity,” Sharpton wrote at the time, pointing to the dismantling of hiring goals and community partnerships as clear signs that “political pressure has outweighed principle.” PepsiCo did not issue a statement following Tuesday’s meeting. The company joins a growing list of major corporations — including Walmart and Target — that have scaled back internal DEI efforts since President Donald Trump returned to office. Trump has eliminated DEI programs from the federal government and warned public schools to do the same or risk losing federal funding. Sharpton has vowed to hold companies accountable. In January, he led a “buy-cott” at Costco to applaud the retailer’s ongoing DEI efforts and announced that NAN would identify two corporations to boycott within 90 days if they failed to uphold equity commitments. “That is the only viable tool that I see at this time, which is why we’ve rewarded those that stood with us,” Sharpton said.
#NNPA BlackPress
Target Reels from Boycotts, Employee Revolt, and Massive Losses as Activists Plot Next Moves
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — Target is spiraling as consumer boycotts intensify, workers push to unionize, and the company faces mounting financial losses following its rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

By Stacy M. Brown
BlackPressUSA.com Senior National Correspondent
Target is spiraling as consumer boycotts intensify, workers push to unionize, and the company faces mounting financial losses following its rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. With foot traffic plummeting, stock prices at a five-year low, and employee discontent boiling over, national civil rights leaders and grassroots organizers are vowing to escalate pressure in the weeks ahead. Led by Georgia pastor Rev. Jamal Bryant, a 40-day “Targetfast” aligned with the Lenten season continues to gain traction. “This is about holding companies accountable for abandoning progress,” Bryant said, as the campaign encourages consumers to shop elsewhere. Groups like the NAACP, the National Newspaper Publishers Association, and The People’s Union USA are amplifying the effort, organizing mass boycotts and strategic buying initiatives to target what they call corporate surrender to bigotry.
Meanwhile, Target’s workforce is in an open revolt. On Reddit, self-identified employees described mass resignations, frustration with meager pay raises, and growing calls to unionize. “We’ve had six people give their two-week notices,” one worker wrote. “A rogue team member gathered us in the back room and started talking about forming a union.” Others echoed the sentiment, with users posting messages like, “We’ve been talking about forming a union at my store too,” and “Good on them for trying to organize—it needs to happen.” Target’s problems aren’t just anecdotal. The numbers reflect a company in crisis. The retail giant has logged 10 straight weeks of falling in-store traffic. In February, foot traffic dropped 9% year-over-year, including a 9.5% plunge on February 28 during the 24-hour “economic blackout” boycott organized by The People’s Union USA. March saw a 6.5% decline compared to the previous year. Operating income fell 21% in the most recent quarter, and the company’s stock (TGT) opened at just $94 on April 14, down from $142 in January before the DEI cuts and subsequent backlash. The economic backlash is growing louder online, too.
“We are still boycotting Target due to them bending to bigotry by eroding their DEI programs,” posted the activist group We Are Somebody on April 14. “Target stock has gone down, and their projections remain flat. DEI was good for business. Do the right thing.” Former congresswoman Nina Turner, a senior fellow at The New School’s Institute on Race, Power and Political Economy, wrote, “Boycotts are effective. Boycotts must have a demand. We will continue to boycott until our demands are met.” More action is on the horizon. Another Target boycott is scheduled for June 3–9, part of a broader campaign targeting corporations that have abandoned DEI initiatives under pressure from right-wing politics and recent executive orders by President Donald Trump. The People’s Union USA, which led the February 28 boycott, has already launched similar weeklong actions against Walmart and announced upcoming boycotts of Amazon (May 6–12), Walmart again (May 20–26), and McDonald’s (June 24–30). The organization’s founder, John Schwarz, said the goal is nothing short of shifting the economic power balance.
“We are going to remind them who has the power,” Schwarz said. “For one day, we turn it off. For one day, we shut it down. For one day, we remind them that this country does not belong to the elite, it belongs to the people.” As for Target, its top executives continue to downplay the damage. During a recent earnings call, Chief Financial Officer Jim Lee described the outlook for 2025 as uncertain, citing the “ripple” effects of tariffs and a wide range of possible outcomes. “We’re going to be focusing on controlling what we can control,” Lee said. But discontent is spreading internally. A Reddit post from a worker claimed, “The HR rep is doing his best to stop the bleeding, but all he did was put a Bluey band-aid on what is essentially a severed limb.”
Several employees criticized the company’s internal rewards system, “Bullseye Bucks,” for offering what amounts to play money. “Can’t pay rent or buy food with Bullseye Bucks,” one wrote. Others urged their colleagues to join unionizing efforts. “Imagine how much Target would lose their mind if they were under a union contract,” one team leader wrote. “It needs to happen at this point.” One former manager said they left the company after an insulting raise. “Quit last year when they gave me a 28-cent raise. Best decision I’ve ever made.” From store floors to boardrooms, the pressure is growing on Target. And as calls for justice, equity, and worker rights get louder, one worker put it plainly: “We’re all screwed—unless we fight back.”
-
Activism4 weeks ago
We Fought on Opposite Sides of the Sheng Thao Recall. Here’s Why We’re Uniting Behind Barbara Lee for Oakland Mayor
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Oakland’s Most Vulnerable Neighborhoods Are Struggling to Eat and Stay Healthy
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Faith Leaders Back Barbara Lee for Mayor, Criticize Candidate Loren Taylor for Dishonest Campaigning
-
Activism3 weeks ago
Oakland Post Endorses Barbara Lee
-
Alameda County4 weeks ago
Trump Order Slashes Federal Agencies Supporting Minority Business and Neighborhood Development
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Group Takes First Steps to Recall District Attorney Diana Becton
-
Activism4 weeks ago
Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas Honors California Women in Construction with State Proclamation, Policy Ideas
-
Bay Area4 weeks ago
Five Years After COVID-19 Began, a Struggling Child Care Workforce Faces New Threats