If you have a question about COVID-19, email Ask SciCheck, a project of FactCheck.org, at AskSciCheck@FactCheck.org. Tell them you are a reader of the Houston Forward Times. You can read previous Ask SciCheck answers here.
#NNPA BlackPress
Q&A on Mpox
Editor’s note: This is an updated version of a Q&A we published in May 2022. Last summer saw the largest outbreak ever of mpox, the disease formerly known as monkeypox. Beginning in May 2022, cases of the disease, which is a much less dangerous relative of smallpox, began cropping up in Europe and other places outside […]
The post Q&A on Mpox first appeared on BlackPressUSA.

Editor’s note: This is an updated version of a Q&A we published in May 2022.
Last summer saw the largest outbreak ever of mpox, the disease formerly known as monkeypox.
Beginning in May 2022, cases of the disease, which is a much less dangerous relative of smallpox, began cropping up in Europe and other places outside of Central and West Africa, where mpox normally occurs sporadically.
People all over the world, primarily gay men and other men who have sex with men, developed painful and infectious lesions characteristic of the disease, and a small number of them died.

By late July 2022, the World Health Organization designated the growing outbreak a public health emergency of international concern. With more than 6,600 American cases, the U.S. also declared mpox a public health emergency in early August.
A year later, the situation has improved. Following a peak of cases in mid-August 2022, and a rapid vaccination campaign in some countries, the outbreak subsided in December. Caseloads fell from more than 1,000 a day worldwide to fewer than 75 a day by the end of the year, and from more than 400 a day in the U.S. to fewer than 10, with further declines since then. Given the relative trickle of cases, the U.S. ended its mpox emergency in January, and the WHO did so in May.
But the outbreak is not over. (Even a single case of confirmed mpox in a country is considered an outbreak.) And with warmer weather and the arrival of Pride month, health officials and other experts are concerned that mpox could be on the rise again. In mid-May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention assessed the risk of resurgent mpox outbreaks as “substantial.”
Here, we provide an update on the disease, and explain what makes the outbreak unusual and how people can protect themselves.
What is mpox?
Mpox is a rare disease caused by the monkeypox virus, which is in the same orthopoxvirus genus and poxvirus family as the more lethal and contagious smallpox virus, according to the CDC.
Mpox is the new name for monkeypox. In November, in recognition that the name could be stigmatizing and does not conform to current best practices for naming diseases, the World Health Organization and the CDC began using mpox to refer to the disease.
The virus name, however, remains unchanged. The International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses, which is responsible for determining virus names, was already considering a virus name change prior to the outbreak, but is still in the middle of the renaming process.
As with other poxvirus diseases, mpox is known for a characteristic rash and is similar in presentation to smallpox, although it will cause lymph nodes to swell and is otherwise less severe.
Mpox is a zoonosis, meaning that the virus is transmitted to people from animals. People typically become infected sporadically in the forested parts of Central and West Africa where the disease is endemic, after an interaction with an infected animal. Once infected, people can spread the virus to others, but that requires close contact.
Mpox’s former name stems from the disease’s discovery in lab monkeys in 1958, but the virus is not found exclusively or even primarily in monkeys. Many species, including rope and tree squirrels, Gambian pouched rats, and dormice, are able to harbor the virus. The natural host and source of the virus is unknown, but is likely to be a rodent.
There are two main types, or clades, of monkeypox virus: clade I, formerly known as the Congo Basin clade, and a less lethal clade II, formerly known as the Congo Basin clade (the clades were also renamed).
The 2022-2023 outbreak is due to a subtype of the less severe clade (clade IIb).
When did the outbreak begin, and how is it unusual?
The 2022-2023 mpox outbreak was first recognized in the U.K. in May 2022, but likely began earlier.
On May 13, 2022, the U.K. reported to the World Health Organization one probable and two confirmed cases of mpox from a single household, in people who had not traveled to an mpox-endemic area.
Other mpox cases were soon recognized in the U.K., other parts of Europe, and in Australia, Canada and the U.S., mainly among men who have sex with men.
Ultimately, as of June 19, mpox has spread to 112 countries, sickening nearly 88,000 people, and killing 147. In the U.S., as of June 21, more than 30,000 cases have been reported, including 43 deaths.
Both the size and geographic range of the outbreak — the largest and widest ever, by far — along with the demographics of the people affected make it unusual.
Normally, mpox is extremely rare outside of Africa, and cases are usually imported with no onward transmission. The first mpox outbreak outside of Africa occurred in the U.S. in 2003 when imported rodents from Ghana sickened pet prairie dogs, who then spread the disease to humans. That outbreak included 47 confirmed or probable cases, according to the CDC.
But with this outbreak, it’s clear that person-to-person transmission has occurred in nonendemic countries. That has never happened before on any kind of scale.
As the WHO says, “This is the first time that cases and sustained chains of transmission have been reported in countries without direct or immediate epidemiological links to areas of West or Central Africa.”
The outbreak has also been atypical because of the high concentration of cases among men who have sex with men. Of the global mpox cases with information on sex or sexual orientation, 96.2% have been in men and 84.1% have been in men who have sex with men, according to WHO data as of June 19.
That does not mean that only these individuals can contract mpox, but they are at higher risk.
What are the symptoms, and how severe is mpox?
Symptoms of mpox are reminiscent of smallpox and usually appear within a week or two after infection. The most common symptom is a rash, which may include only a single, small lesion, or may be widespread. Other symptoms include fever, headache, swollen lymph nodes, muscle aches, fatigue, chills, sore throat and respiratory symptoms.
According to the WHO, in previous outbreaks, mpox typically began with a fever, muscle aches and a sore throat before a rash would appear on the face and spread to the rest of the body, including the palms of the hands and soles of the feet.
But in the latest outbreak, many patients develop a rash first or never experience other symptoms — and the rash often remains localized. Frequently, the first lesions occur in genital areas or in or around the anus or mouth. Some patients develop rectal pain and bleeding.
The rash starts off flat, then progresses to raised and fluid- and pus-filled lesions, which then scab over and fall off. The lesions are usually painful until they crust over, when they are itchy.
Mpox is usually mild, sickening people for two to four weeks, although the disease may be painful and highly unpleasant.
Severe disease and death, however, are possible. As the WHO explains, patients can develop secondary skin infections, lose their vision, become dehydrated or malnourished, and develop sepsis or inflammation of a variety of organs.
People who are immunocompromised, including those with uncontrolled HIV, are at higher risk of more severe disease, as are pregnant people and children.
Fortunately, the virus identified in the latest cases belongs to the less lethal clade II, which has been shown to kill about 1% of people identified with the disease in Africa, according to the WHO, in contrast to clade I, which may kill up to 10%.
Statistics for the current outbreak suggest the risk of death is much lower than 1%, although this may reflect improved identification of cases, better access to health care, or differences in the number of immunosuppressed people in a population.
In the U.S., 0.14% of people with mpox have died. According to a CDC review of mpox-related deaths as of this March, “nearly all” of those who died were immunocompromised, the vast majority of whom had HIV.
How is the virus transmitted, and how contagious is it?
Mpox is initially spread to a person through an infected animal in an endemic area, which could occur through a bite or scratch or any contact with the animal’s body or lesion fluids.
Once humans are infected, they can pass the virus on to others through close contact. Often, but not always, this involves direct contact with an infected person’s skin, since the rash, including scabs and fluids from the lesions, are especially infectious.
In the 2022-2023 outbreak, transmission has primarily occurred through sexual contact. Patients have frequently reported mpox rashes on their genitals or in their mouths.
Mpox is therefore considered sexually transmissible, although there remains some debate as to whether it should be labeled a sexually transmitted infection, or STI. Although viable virus is present in semen, it’s not known if the virus can be spread through semen or vaginal fluids.
Mpox, however, does not require sexual or even physical contact with another person to spread. Because lesions in the mouth can render saliva infectious, the virus can also spread through respiratory droplets, although it takes a lot of face-to-face contact to spread the virus this way.
Contaminated clothing, bedding or other objects can also spread mpox, although the CDC considers this route of transmission to be low risk.
Because a high level of contact is usually required, mpox is not considered very contagious, in contrast to COVID-19.
People are infectious until their scabs fall off and a new layer of skin forms. According to the CDC, everyone is infectious from the time they develop symptoms, but some mpox patients may also be able to spread the disease up to four days before symptoms appear.
A small proportion of people infected with the virus never develop any symptoms and are considered asymptomatic. It’s not known whether these individuals are ever infectious. It’s possible they may be, since culturable virus has been identified in a couple of asymptomatic people. But there have not been any confirmed cases of asymptomatic transmission.
To protect others, people who have mpox should isolate for the duration of their illness and notify their close contacts so those individuals can get vaccinated and isolate, and get tested if they develop symptoms.
How is mpox treated?
There are no mpox-specific treatments. Most mpox treatment consists of supportive care and managing a person’s symptoms, such as taking medicines to relieve fever and pain, which can be severe.
For those with lesions in their mouths, the CDC recommends rinsing with salt water multiple times per day. Certain mouthwashes and oral anesthetics can also help.
Patients should avoid touching their rash, even if it is itchy. Topical creams or gels, along with antihistamines, may help with the pain or itchiness, and some people with anal or genital lesions may find it soothing to take a warm sitz bath.
All patients should monitor their skin for secondary bacterial infections, which can be treated with antibiotics.
If someone is severely ill or at high-risk for severe disease, there are other treatment options, although they are not well studied and have not been FDA-approved for mpox. These include the antivirals tecovirimat, brincidofovir and cidofovir, as well as intravenous vaccinia immune globulin, which is purified antibody collected from people vaccinated with a smallpox vaccine. Another antiviral, trifluridine, can be used if someone has or is at risk for eye lesions.
None of the drugs has been shown to work against mpox in a clinical trial. They are being used largely on the basis of their effectiveness against orthopoxviruses in animals. Some can have significant side effects and are only available from the Strategic National Stockpile.
The most important of these is tecovirimat, or Tpoxx, which is FDA-approved for smallpox and is the “first-line therapy” for seriously ill and high-risk mpox patients, according to the CDC.
Tecovirimat, which is almost always taken as a pill, has been tested for safety in healthy people, but not for efficacy. It has been shown to protect monkeys against a lethal dose of monkeypox virus when given within five days of infection.
Because the drug is investigational and it’s not known if it’s safe and effective to treat mpox, patients are encouraged to receive tecovirimat in an ongoing clinical trial (STOMP).
Tecovirimat’s safety profile is better than several of the other antivirals being considered for mpox. A CDC study of nearly 550 mpox patients in the U.S. who received tecovirimat last summer found that the drug was well tolerated, similar to another small study in California and the trial results in healthy people. The CDC study also found that people’s symptoms improved within a median of three days, although there was no control group to tell whether that was faster than without the drug.
One concern with tecovirimat is that monkeypox virus may be able to easily become resistant to the drug, which is one reason why it’s limited to high-risk people.
How can someone protect themselves from getting mpox?
People can prevent mpox by getting vaccinated and by avoiding or reducing close contact with others who may be infected. This includes lowering one’s risk by practicing safer sex and limiting the number of sexual partners, especially prior to vaccination and during the time between the first and second doses of the Jynneos vaccine.
The Jynneos vaccine is a third-generation smallpox vaccine that is also FDA-approved for mpox. It’s a two-dose vaccine injected either below the skin or between skin layers (subcutaneously or intradermally), 28 days apart, to those who are at high risk of mpox. Vaccination is not recommended for the general public.
Ideally, the Jynneos vaccine is given prior to exposure or within four days of exposure to prevent mpox. However, it can still be given up to 14 days after an exposure, as it still may lessen the severity of the disease.
Vaccination is not expected to be helpful once someone has tested positive for mpox or developed symptoms, according to the CDC. People also do not need to get vaccinated if they previously had mpox, nor complete vaccination if they got mpox after a first dose — with some exceptions for certain immunocompromised people.
The Jynneos vaccine is made from weakened vaccinia virus, a related but less severe orthopox virus. The weakened version in the vaccine doesn’t make people sick and doesn’t replicate in human cells (the vaccine can’t give you smallpox or mpox).
Another smallpox vaccine, ACAM2000, which uses a weakened vaccinia virus that does replicate, has been made available for the mpox outbreak. But it has not been used, since it has more side effects than Jynneos and should not be given to people who are immunocompromised, among others.
How effective is the Jynneos vaccine?
Prior to the 2022 outbreak, the Jynneos vaccine had only been tested for efficacy in animals and evaluated for effectiveness in people by studying people’s immune responses to the vaccine, so it wasn’t clear how well it would work in practice against mpox. However, studies of the vaccine’s performance last summer have found it works quite well.
A preliminary study published by the CDC found that between late July and early October 2022, mpox was 9.6 times more frequent among vaccine-eligible adult males below the age of 50 who were unvaccinated than those who had received two doses of vaccine, and 7.4 times more frequent than those who had received a single dose. The analysis, however, could not control for many factors that might make the unvaccinated and vaccinated populations different.
The study also suggested that there wasn’t a difference in effectiveness whether the vaccine was given subcutaneously or intradermally. The Jynneos vaccine was approved in 2019 as a subcutaneous shot, but in August 2022, facing limited vaccine supply, the FDA authorized the vaccine to be given intradermally, which uses a fifth of the subcutaneous dose.
A trio of studies published this May back up these findings. A study in New York state that compared mpox vaccination rates in people who were diagnosed with mpox with those of control patients who were diagnosed with rectal gonorrhea or primary syphilis found that a single Jynneos dose was 68% effective against symptomatic mpox and two doses were 89% effective.
Another CDC study, covering 12 states or cities, estimated vaccine effectiveness at 75% for a single dose and 86% for two. It did not find any major differences in effectiveness for those vaccinated intradermally versus subcutaneously, suggesting both routes are comparable. The study also found lower levels of protection in immunocompromised individuals, although this was not statistically significant.
A third study, drawing on nationwide electronic health records and published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found partial and full vaccination to reduce the risk of a medically attended case of mpox by 36% and 66%, respectively.
Although the specific point estimates of vaccine effectiveness vary, the studies consistently found that the Jynneos vaccine lowers the risk of mpox and that two doses are better than one.
No vaccine is 100% effective, and it’s not known how long vaccination protects against mpox. There have been reported mpox cases in those who have been vaccinated, including a majority of individuals identified in an mpox cluster of 40 people in Chicago this spring. According to a CDC report, the fully vaccinated patients in the cluster had mild symptoms and were less likely than those who were partially vaccinated or unvaccinated to have genital lesions or lesions affecting the eyes. The two hospitalizations in the cluster occurred in unvaccinated people with advanced HIV.
The resurgence of mpox in Chicago, however, underscores the concern from health officials that mpox could make a comeback this summer.
A CDC modeling analysis from April concluded that locales with low levels of vaccination coverage — specifically less than 35% of the at-risk population having received at least one Jynneos dose — have a 35% or higher chance of an mpox outbreak, if the disease is reintroduced to the area. This includes most jurisdictions in the U.S., although not last summer’s mpox hot spots, including California, the District of Columbia, Illinois and New York.
Editor’s note: SciCheck’s articles providing accurate health information and correcting health misinformation are made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The foundation has no control over FactCheck.org’s editorial decisions, and the views expressed in our articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the foundation.
The post Q&A on Mpox appeared first on Forward Times.
The post Q&A on Mpox first appeared on BlackPressUSA.
#NNPA BlackPress
A Nation in Freefall While the Powerful Feast: Trump Calls Affordability a ‘Con Job’
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — There are seasons in this country when the struggle of ordinary Americans is not merely a condition but a kind of weather that settles over everything.
By Stacy M. Brown
Black Press USA Senior National Correspondent
There are seasons in this country when the struggle of ordinary Americans is not merely a condition but a kind of weather that settles over everything. It enters the grocery aisle, the overdue bill, the rent notice, and the long nights spent calculating how to get through the next week. The latest numbers show that this season has not passed. It has deepened.
Private employers cut 32,000 jobs in November, according to ADP. Because the nation has been hemorrhaging jobs since President Trump took office, the administration has halted publishing the traditional monthly report. The ADP report revealed that small businesses suffered the heaviest losses. Establishments with fewer than 50 workers shed 120,000 positions, including 74,000 from companies with 20 to 49 workers. Larger firms added 90,000 jobs, widening the split between those rising and those falling.
Meanwhile, wealth continues to climb for the few who already possess most of it. Federal Reserve data shows the top 1 percent now holds $52 trillion. The top 10 percent added $5 trillion in the second quarter alone. The bottom half gained only 6 percent over the past year, a number so small it fades beside the towering fortunes above it.
“Less educated and poorer people tend to make worse mistakes,” John Campbell said to CBS News, while noting that the complexity of the system leaves many families lost before they even begin. Campbell, a Harvard University economist and coauthor of a book examining the country’s broken personal finance structure, pointed to a system built to confuse and punish those who lack time, training, or access.
“Creditors are just breathing down their necks,” Carol Fox told Bloomberg News, while noting that rising borrowing costs, shrinking consumer spending, and trade battles under the current administration have left owners desperate. Fox serves as a court-appointed Subchapter V trustee in Southern Florida and has watched the crisis unfold case by case.
During a cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Trump told those present that affordability “doesn’t mean anything to anybody.” He added that Democrats created a “con job” to mislead the public.
However, more than $30 million in taxpayer funds reportedly have supported his golf travel. Reports show Kristi Noem and FBI Director Kash Patel have also made extensive use of private jets through government and political networks. The administration approved a $40 billion bailout of Argentina. The president’s wealthy donors recently gathered for a dinner celebrating his planned $300 million White House ballroom.
During an appearance on CNBC, Mark Zandi, an economist, warned that the country could face serious economic threats. “We have learned that people make many mistakes,” Campbell added. “And particularly, sadly, less educated and poorer people tend to make worse mistakes.”
#NNPA BlackPress
The Numbers Behind the Myth of the Hundred Million Dollar Contract
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — Odell Beckham Jr. did not spark controversy on purpose. He sat on The Pivot Podcast and tried to explain the math behind a deal that looks limitless from the outside but shrinks fast once the system takes its cut.
By Stacy M. Brown
Black Press USA Senior National Correspondent
Odell Beckham Jr. did not spark controversy on purpose. He sat on The Pivot Podcast and tried to explain the math behind a deal that looks limitless from the outside but shrinks fast once the system takes its cut. He looked into the camera and tried to offer a truth most fans never hear. “You give somebody a five-year $100 million contract, right? What is it really? It is five years for sixty. You are getting taxed. Do the math. That is twelve million a year that you have to spend, use, save, invest, flaunt,” said Beckham. He added that buying a car, buying his mother a house, and covering the costs of life all chip away at what people assume lasts forever.
The reaction was instant. Many heard entitlement. Many heard a millionaire complaining. What they missed was a glimpse into a professional world built on big numbers up front and a quiet erasing of those numbers behind the scenes.
The tax data in Beckham’s world is not speculation. SmartAsset’s research shows that top NFL players often lose close to half their income to federal taxes, state taxes, and local taxes. The analysis explains that athletes in California face a state rate of 13.3 percent and that players are also taxed in every state where they play road games, a structure widely known as the jock tax. For many players, that means filing up to ten separate returns and facing a combined tax burden that reaches or exceeds 50 percent.
A look across the league paints the same picture. The research lists star players in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, Detroit, and Cleveland, all giving up between 43 and 47 percent of their football income before they ever touch a dollar. Star quarterback Phillip Rivers, at one point, was projected to lose half of his playing income to taxes alone.
A second financial breakdown from MGO CPA shows that the problem does not only affect the highest earners. A $1 million salary falls to about $529,000 after federal taxes, state and city taxes, an agent fee, and a contract deduction. According to that analysis, professional athletes typically take home around half of their contract value, and that is before rent, meals, training, travel, and support obligations are counted.
The structure of professional sports contracts adds another layer. A study of major deals across MLB, the NBA, and the NFL notes that long-term agreements lose value over time because the dollar today has more power than the dollar paid in the future. Even the largest deals shrink once adjusted for time. The study explains that contract size alone does not guarantee financial success and that structure and timing play a crucial role in a player’s long-term outcomes.
Beckham has also faced headlines claiming he is “on the brink of bankruptcy despite earning over one hundred million” in his career. Those reports repeated his statement that “after taxes, it is only sixty million” and captured the disbelief from fans who could not understand how money at that level could ever tighten.
Other reactions lacked nuance. One article wrote that no one could relate to any struggle on eight million dollars a year. Another described his approach as “the definition of a new-money move” and argued that it signaled poor financial choices and inflated spending.
But the underlying truth reaches far beyond Beckham. Professional athletes enter sudden wealth without preparation. They carry the weight of family support. They navigate teams, agents, advisors, and expectations from every direction. Their earning window is brief. Their career can end in a moment. Their income is fragmented, taxed, and carved up before the public ever sees the real number.
The math is unflinching. Twenty million dollars becomes something closer to $8 million after federal taxes, state taxes, jock taxes, agent fees, training costs, and family responsibilities. Over five years, that is about $40 million of real, spendable income. It is transformative money, but not infinite. Not guaranteed. Not protected.
Beckham offered a question at the heart of this entire debate. “Can you make that last forever?”
#NNPA BlackPress
FBI Report Warns of Fear, Paralysis, And Political Turmoil Under Director Kash Patel
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — Six months into Kash Patel’s tenure as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a newly compiled internal report from a national alliance of retired and active-duty FBI agents and analysts delivers a stark warning about what the Bureau has become under his leadership.
Six months into Kash Patel’s tenure as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a newly compiled internal report from a national alliance of retired and active-duty FBI agents and analysts delivers a stark warning about what the Bureau has become under his leadership. The 115-page document, submitted to Congress this month, is built entirely on verified reporting from inside field offices across the country and paints a picture of an agency gripped by fear, divided by ideology, and drifting without direction.
The report’s authors write that they launched their inquiry after receiving troubling accounts from inside the Bureau only four months into Patel’s tenure. They describe their goal as a pulse check on whether the ninth FBI director was reforming the Bureau or destabilizing it. Their conclusion: the preliminary findings were discouraging.
Reports Describe Widespread Internal Distrust and Open Hostility Toward President Trump
Sources across the country told investigators that a large number of FBI employees openly express hostility toward President Donald Trump. One source reported seeing an “increasing number of FBI Special Agents who dislike the President,” adding that these employees were exhibiting what they called “TDS” and had lost “their ability to think critically about an issue and distinguish fact from fiction.” Another source described employees making off-color comments about the administration during office conversations.
The sentiment reportedly extends beyond domestic lines. Law enforcement and intelligence partners in allied countries have privately expressed fear that the Trump administration could damage long-term international cooperation according to a sub-source who reported those concerns directly to investigators.
Pardon Backlash and Fear of Retaliation
The President’s January 20 pardons of individuals convicted for their roles in the January 6 attack ignited what the report calls demoralization inside the Bureau. One FBI employee said they were “demoralized” that individuals “rightfully convicted” were pardoned and feared that some of those individuals or their supporters might target them or their family for carrying out their duties. Another source described widespread anger that lists of personnel who worked on January 6 investigations had been provided to the Justice Department for review, noting that agents “were just following orders” and now worry those lists could leak publicly.
Morale In Decline
Morale among FBI employees appears to be sinking fast. There were a few scattered positive notes, but the weight of the reporting describes morale as low, bad, or terrible. Agents with more than a decade of service told investigators they feel marginalized or ignored. Some are counting the days until they can retire. One even uses a countdown app on their phone.
Culture Of Fear
Layered over that unhappiness is something far more corrosive. A culture of fear. Sources say Patel, though personable, created mistrust from the start because of harsh remarks he made about the FBI before taking office. Agents took those comments personally. They now work in an atmosphere where employees keep their heads down and speak carefully. Managers wait for directions because they are afraid a wrong move could cost them their jobs. One source said agents dread coming to work because nobody knows who will be reassigned or fired next.
Leadership Concerns
The report also paints a picture of leaders unprepared for the jobs they hold. Multiple sources said Patel is in over his head and lacks the breadth of experience required to understand the Bureau’s complex programs. Some said Deputy Director Dan Bongino should never have been appointed because the role requires deep institutional knowledge of FBI operations. A sub-source recounted Bongino telling employees during a field office visit that “the truth is for chumps.” Employees who heard it were stunned and offended.
Social Media and Communication Breakdowns
Communication inside the Bureau has become another source of frustration. Sources said Patel and Bongino spend too much time posting on social media and not enough time communicating with employees in clear and official ways. Several told investigators they learn more about FBI operations from tweets than from internal channels.
ICE Assignments Raise Alarm
Nothing has sparked more frustration inside the FBI than the orders requiring agents to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The reporting shows widespread resentment and fear over these assignments. Agents say they have little training in immigration law and were ordered into operations without proper planning. Some said they were put in tactically unsafe positions. They also warned that being pulled away from counterterrorism and counterintelligence investigations threatens national security. One sub-source asked, “If we’re not working CT and CI, then who is?”
DEI Program Removal
Even the future of diversity programs became a point of division. Some agents praised Patel’s removal of DEI initiatives. Others said the old system left them afraid to speak honestly because they worried about being labeled racist. The reporting shows a deep and unresolved conflict over whether DEI strengthened the organization or weakened it.
Notable Incidents
The document also details several incidents that have become part of FBI lore. Patel ordered all employees to remove pronouns and personal messages from their email signatures yet used the number nine in his own. Agents laughed at what they saw as hypocrisy. In another episode, FBI employees who discussed Patel’s request for an FBI-issued firearm were ordered to take polygraph examinations, which one respected source described as punitive. And in Utah, Patel refused to exit a plane without a medium-sized FBI raid jacket. A team scrambled to find one and finally secured a female agent’s jacket. Patel still refused to step out until patches were added. SWAT members removed patches from their own uniforms to satisfy the demand.
A Bureau at a Crossroad
The Alliance warns that the Bureau stands at a difficult crossroads. They write that the FBI faces some of the most daunting challenges in its history. But even in despair, a few voices say something different. One veteran source said “It is early, but most can see the mission is now the priority. Case work and threats are the focus again. Reform is headed in the right direction.”
-
Bay Area4 weeks agoPost Salon to Discuss Proposal to Bring Costco to Oakland Community meeting to be held at City Hall, Thursday, Dec. 18
-
Activism4 weeks agoMayor Lee, City Leaders Announce $334 Million Bond Sale for Affordable Housing, Roads, Park Renovations, Libraries and Senior Centers
-
Activism4 weeks agoOakland School Board Grapples with Potential $100 Million Shortfall Next Year
-
Activism4 weeks ago2025 in Review: Seven Questions for Black Women’s Think Tank Founder Kellie Todd Griffin
-
Arts and Culture4 weeks agoFayeth Gardens Holds 3rd Annual Kwanzaa Celebration at Hayward City Hall on Dec. 28
-
Advice4 weeks agoCOMMENTARY: If You Don’t Want Your ‘Black Card’ Revoked, Watch What You Bring to Holiday Dinners
-
Activism4 weeks agoAnn Lowe: The Quiet Genius of American Couture
-
Activism3 weeks agoDesmond Gumbs — Visionary Founder, Mentor, and Builder of Opportunity




