Connect with us

Crime

Settlement Reached for Protesters Who Sued Alameda County Over Jail Conditions

Published

on

Four women who sued Alameda County over unhygienic and humiliating conditions at the Santa Rita Jail in Dublin reached a $130,000 settlement with the county on August 1. 

 

Plaintiffs Anne Weills, Tova Fry, Alyssa Eisenberg and Mollie Costello were arrested in February 2014 while protesting in Oakland. They and other protesters were drawing attention to the death of Alan Blueford, who was shot and killed by an Oakland police officer in 2012.

 

“We were demanding Kamala Harris investigate the deaths of young Black and Brown men by local police departments,” said Weills, who was acting as a legal observer when the California Highway Patrol arrested the women on suspicion of misdemeanor trespassing.

 

The four women were then taken to Santa Rita Jail, where they said they experienced conditions both humiliating and biohazardous.

 

“In the back of the cell was an overflowing toilet with feces and blood. To the left of the toilet was a pile of bloody clothes from women who were menstruating, and there was old food left out,” Weills said.

 

“[Deputies] also demanded that we take off our outer garments… and to the left and right of us were two holding cells where at least 10 to 20 male prisoners could see us,” she said.

 

Policies adopted from the settlement now require curtains for female inmates at Santa Rita Jail to use during screenings, basic amenities like trash bags and menstrual pads for female inmates, and will improve training for deputies.

 

According to Weills, the jail will also now clean up the cells every hour. “There is going to be a log, and every shift has to be signed off. ‘Yes the cell is clean’ or ‘yes they have access to menstrual pads.’ There will be a level of enforcement through the logging.”

 

Weills and the other plaintiffs quickly sought legal recourse after their arrest to bring attention to and change the degrading conditions that women inmates face at Santa Rita Jail.

 

“We were a privileged class of women and we thought, ‘what do we have available to fight this so it doesn’t happen again to a less privileged class that experiences this week in and week out?’” she said.

 

Prior to reaching the settlement, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors in June approved $116.9 million in upgrades to the Santa Rita Jail, including a new medical wing for improved healthcare and mental health services to inmates.

 

And just days after the lawsuit settled, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted on August 5 to end its contract with Corizon Health, which had provided medical care for Alameda County jails for nearly three decades.

 

According to the East Bay Times, Corizon laid off 63 nurses earlier this year after an $8.3 million settlement over the death of Martin Harrison, a 50-year-old Oakland resident who died in Santa Rita Jail.

 

The Times also reported a second lawsuit was filed in February by the family of 29-year-old Mario Martinez, who died at the jail of a severe asthma attack.

 

Shawn Wilson, Chief of Staff for Alameda County Supervisor Scott Haggerty, said he was unaware whether the decision to cut ties with Corizon had any direct relation to the case involving the four women at Santa Rita Jail, but that some supervisors had finally “had enough with Corizon and the number of complaints that had been cited.”

 

Weills sees things a bit differently.

 

“I think our case and these other cases are threatening (Sheriff-Coroner Gregory Ahern)’s control over the jail,” she said.

 

With the $130,000 settlement, the four women plan to distribute ‘know your rights’ pamphlets to inmates at the jail.

 

They also plan to set up a hotline run through The Alan Blueford Center for Justice in Oakland for women at Santa Rita Jail “who have stories to tell and questions to ask,” Weills said.

 

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of December 24 – 30, 2025

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 24 – 30, 2025

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Alameda County

Oakland Council Expands Citywide Security Cameras Despite Major Opposition

In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”

Published

on

At the International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference, Flock Safety introduces new public safety technology – Amplified Intelligence, a suite of AI-powered tools designed to improve law enforcement investigations. Courtesy photo.
At the International Association of Chiefs of Police Conference, Flock Safety introduces new public safety technology – Amplified Intelligence, a suite of AI-powered tools designed to improve law enforcement investigations. Courtesy photo.

By Post Staff

The Oakland City Council this week approved a $2.25 million contract with Flock Safety for a mass surveillance network of hundreds of security cameras to track vehicles in the city.

In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”

In recent weeks hundreds of local residents have spoken against the camera system, raising concerns that data will be shared with immigration authorities and other federal agencies at a time when mass surveillance is growing across the country with little regard for individual rights.

The Flock network, supported by the Oakland Police Department, has the backing of residents and councilmembers who see it as an important tool to protect public safety.

“This system makes the Department more efficient as it allows for information related to disruptive/violent criminal activities to be captured … and allows for precise and focused enforcement,” OPD wrote in its proposal to City Council.

According to OPD, police made 232 arrests using data from Flock cameras between July 2024 and November of this year.

Based on the data, police say they recovered 68 guns, and utilizing the countywide system, they have found 1,100 stolen vehicles.

However, Flock’s cameras cast a wide net. The company’s cameras in Oakland last month captured license plate numbers and other information from about 1.4 million vehicles.

Speaking at Tuesday’s Council meeting, Fife was critical of her colleagues for signing a contract with a company that has been in the national spotlight for sharing data with federal agencies.

Flock’s cameras – which are automated license plate readers – have been used in tracking people who have had abortions, monitoring protesters, and aiding in deportation roundups.

“I don’t know how we get up and have several press conferences talking about how we are supportive of a sanctuary city status but then use a vendor that has been shown to have a direct relationship with (the U.S.) Border Control,” she said. “It doesn’t make sense to me.”

Several councilmembers who voted in favor of the contract said they supported the deal as long as some safeguards were written into the Council’s resolution.

“We’re not aiming for perfection,” said District 1 Councilmember Zac Unger. “This is not Orwellian facial recognition technology — that’s prohibited in Oakland. The road forward here is to add as many amendments as we can.”

Amendments passed by the Council prohibit OPD from sharing camera data with any other agencies for the purpose of “criminalizing reproductive or gender affirming healthcare” or for federal immigration enforcement. California state law also prohibits the sharing of license plate reader data with the federal government, and because Oakland’s sanctuary city status, OPD is not allowed to cooperate with immigration authorities.

A former member of Oakland’s Privacy Advisory Commission has sued OPD, alleging that it has violated its own rules around data sharing.

So far, OPD has shared Flock data with 50 other law enforcement agencies.

Continue Reading

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of December 17 – 23, 2025

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 17 – 23, 2025

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.