#NNPA BlackPress
Trump Administration Targets Black Pilots, Weaponizing Lies About Diversity
NNPA NEWSWIRE — In a stunning display of bigotry disguised as governance, Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum ordering the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to eliminate hiring policies designed to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
By Stacy M. Brown
NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent
@StacyBrownMedia
Donald Trump and his hate-filled administration have launched another racist attack, this time aiming at Black pilots and diversity efforts in the aviation industry. In a stunning display of bigotry disguised as governance, Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum ordering the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to eliminate hiring policies designed to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). The memo outrageously claims that DEI programs jeopardize safety and efficiency—despite zero evidence to back such a claim.
Trump’s memorandum, dripping with thinly veiled racism, demands the FAA “return to merit-based hiring” and review the past performance of all employees in critical safety positions. The administration accuses the Biden-era DEI policies of “violating the public trust” by allegedly prioritizing individuals with disabilities and other marginalized groups overqualified candidates. Industry experts have blasted the memo as baseless and incendiary, calling it an attack on years of progress in promoting fairness and representation in aviation. “This is nothing more than weaponized hate,” said Tennessee Garvey, a pilot with 22 years of experience. “There’s never been any proof that diversity jeopardizes safety. This is about stoking fear and division, not protecting passengers.”
False Narratives, Real Damage
The Trump administration’s baseless claims are not only insulting but dangerous. Pilots, air traffic controllers, and aviation experts have universally condemned the idea that DEI initiatives threaten safety. The aviation industry operates under some of the strictest standards in the world, with all personnel required to meet rigorous qualifications regardless of their background. “Why don’t we go back in history and research every airplane crash and tell me how many times a Black pilot was the cause?” asked Eric Hendrick, Delta Airlines’ director of pilot outreach and a former pilot. “Everyone has to meet the same high standards. To weaponize DEI like this is just ridiculous.” Hendrick’s frustration is echoed by Garvey, who heads the Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals (OBAP), a group that has championed the inclusion and advancement of Black professionals in aviation for over 50 years. “DEI doesn’t lower standards—it raises opportunities,” Garvey said. “Representation is critical to fostering a stronger, more innovative industry.”
A Manufactured Crisis
Despite the Trump administration’s rhetoric, the numbers tell a different story. Black pilots represent just 4% of all pilots in the United States, while Latinos account for only 10% of FAA employees. These figures highlight a systemic lack of representation, not overreach. Programs like DEI aim to address these gaps, ensuring that talent from all communities has a chance to thrive in an industry that shapes millions of lives daily. Oscar Torres, president of the National Hispanic Coalition of Federal Aviation Employees, said efforts to dismantle DEI programs could have long-term consequences for recruitment and retention. “Latinos are the largest minority in the country, but our numbers in the FAA don’t reflect that,” Torres said. “DEI isn’t about favoring one group over another—it’s about making sure opportunities are available to everyone.” The FAA has struggled with staffing shortages for years, particularly among air traffic controllers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics projects that 18,000 pilot jobs will open annually through 2033, yet the administration’s order could exacerbate existing recruitment challenges by discouraging underrepresented groups from pursuing aviation careers.
Industry Outrage
Trump’s executive order has drawn sharp criticism from major figures within the aviation industry, who argue that dismantling DEI programs undermines safety and progress. Garvey said the directive threatens to reverse decades of mentorship, training, and career development for Black pilots and other underrepresented workers. “This is about dismantling opportunities and erasing the progress we’ve made,” Garvey said. “Diversity makes us stronger. It’s morally right, and it’s essential for the long-term success of aviation.” Hendrick pointed out that diversity programs have been a cornerstone of major airlines for decades, independent of federal mandates. “Trump’s order is symbolic of what they want to do politically, but it doesn’t reflect the aviation industry,” he said. “Airlines will continue to promote fairness in hiring and advancement, regardless of political pressure.”
The Fight for Representation
For advocates like Garvey and Torres, Trump’s memo only reinforces the need to double down on efforts to ensure equal opportunities in aviation. Organizations like OBAP and the National Hispanic Coalition of Federal Aviation Employees are more determined than ever to support aspiring pilots, air traffic controllers, and aerospace professionals from underrepresented communities. “We’re not going anywhere,” Garvey said. “We’re going to keep mentoring, training, and advocating because diversity isn’t just important—it’s necessary. Representation matters, and we’re going to fight to ensure this industry reflects the world it serves.” Garvey stressed that diversity initiatives are not about lowering standards but about breaking down barriers. “There’s nothing wrong with creating opportunities. There’s nothing wrong with making people feel valued. And there’s nothing wrong with diversity,” he said. “This executive order might be an obstacle, but it won’t stop us.”
A Dangerous Precedent
Aviation professionals warn of the broader implications for other industries as the Trump administration continues to weaponize lies about diversity. “If this is what they’re willing to do in aviation, where safety is paramount, what’s next?” Garvey asked. “This isn’t just about pilots—it’s about who gets to participate in America’s economy and future.” For now, organizations like OBAP remain steadfast in their mission. “We’ve been here for over 50 years, and we’re not stopping now,” Garvey said. “This fight is far from over.”
#NNPA BlackPress
MacKenzie Scott’s Billion-Dollar Defiance of America’s War on Diversity
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — Her most recent gifts to historically Black colleges and universities surpass $400 million this year alone. These are not gestures. They are declarations. They say that the education of Black students is not optional, not expendable and not dependent on the approval of those who fear what an educated Black citizenry represents.
By Stacy M. Brown
Black Press USA Senior National Correspondent
There are moments in American life when truth steps forward and refuses to be convenient. MacKenzie Scott has chosen such a moment. As political forces move to strip diversity from classrooms, silence Black scholarship, and erase equity from public life, she has gone in the opposite direction. She has invested her wealth in the communities this country has spent centuries trying to marginalize.
Her most recent gifts to historically Black colleges and universities have surpassed $400 million this year alone. These are not gestures. They are declarations. They say that the education of Black students is not optional, not expendable, and not dependent on the approval of those who fear what an educated Black citizenry represents.
And she is not the only woman doing what America’s institutions have refused to do. Melinda French Gates has invested billions in supporting women and girls worldwide, ensuring that those whose rights are most fragile receive the most assistance. At a time when this nation tries to erase Black history and restrict the rights of women, two white women, once married to two of the richest white men in the world, have made clear where they stand. They have said, through their giving, that marginalized people deserve not just acknowledgment but investment.
At Prairie View A and M University, Scott’s $63 million gift became the largest in the institution’s 149-year history. “This gift is more than generous. It is defining and affirming,” President Tomikia P. LeGrande said. “MacKenzie Scott’s investment amplifies the power and promise of Prairie View A and M University.” The university said it plans to strengthen scholarships, expand faculty research, and support critical programs in artificial intelligence, public health, agricultural sustainability, and cybersecurity.
Howard University received an $80 million donation that leaders described as transformative. “On behalf of the entire Howard University community, I want to extend my deepest gratitude to Ms. MacKenzie Scott for her extraordinary generosity and steadfast belief in Howard University’s mission,” Wayne A. I. Frederick said. The gift will support student aid, infrastructure, and key expansions in academic and medical research.
Elsewhere, the impact ripples outward. Voorhees University received the most significant gift in its 128-year history. Norfolk State, Morgan State, Spelman, Winston-Salem State, Virginia State, Alcorn State, and the University of Maryland Eastern Shore all confirmed contributions that will reshape their futures. Bowie State University received $50 million, also a historic mark. “We are profoundly grateful to MacKenzie Scott for her visionary commitment to education and equity,” President Aminta Breaux said. “The gift empowers us to expand access and uplift generations of students who will lead, serve, and innovate.”
These gifts arrive at a moment when America attempts to revise its own memory. Curriculum bans seek to remove Black history from classrooms. Political movements claim that diversity is dangerous. Women’s contributions are minimized. And institutions that have served Black communities for more than a century must withstand both political hostility and financial neglect.
Scott’s philanthropy does not simply counter these forces. It exposes them. It asserts that Black students, Black institutions, and Black futures deserve resources commensurate with their brilliance. It declares that women’s leadership is not marginal but central to the fight for justice.
This is where the mission of the Black Press becomes intertwined with the story unfolding. For nearly two centuries, the Black Press of America has chronicled the truth of Black life. It has told the stories that others refused to tell, preserved the history that others attempted to bury, and spoken truths that others feared. The National Newspaper Publishers Association, representing more than 200 Black and women-owned newspapers and media companies, continues that mission today despite financial threats that jeopardize independent Black journalism.
Like the HBCUs Scott uplifts, the Black Press has always been more than a collection of institutions. It is a safeguard. It is a mirror. It is the memory of a people whose presence in this nation has been met with both hostility and unimaginable strength. It survives not because it is funded but because it is essential.
Scott’s giving suggests an understanding of this. She has aligned herself with institutions that protect truth, expand opportunity, and preserve the stories this country tries to erase. She has chosen the side of history that refuses to be silent.
“When Bowie State thrives,” declared Brent Swinton, the university’s vice president of Philanthropic Engagement, “our tight-knit community of alumni, families, and partners across the region and beyond thrives with us.”
#NNPA BlackPress
The Perfumed Hand of Hypocrisy: Trump Hosted Former Terror Suspect While America Condemns a Muslim Mayor
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE — They had the audacity, the gall, the hypocrisy to condemn Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City, while opening the White House to a man their own government once called a terrorist.
By Stacy M. Brown
Black Press USA Senior National Correspondent
They had the audacity, the gall, the hypocrisy to condemn Zohran Mamdani, the newly elected mayor of New York City, while opening the White House to a man their own government once called a terrorist. It was not long ago that the U.S. Embassy in Syria published a “Rewards for Justice” notice for Muhammad al-Jawlani, offering ten million dollars for his capture. His face, his name, and his crimes were displayed for the world to see. That poster remains online even now, an unaltered monument to America’s selective memory.
Yet this month, that same man, now known as Ahmad al-Sharaa, was greeted in the Oval Office as a partner and friend. The president who bans Muslims, mocks immigrants, and threatens to deport an elected official of color, smiled warmly for the cameras beside a man once sworn to jihad. He called their meeting “friendly and forward-looking” and praised al-Sharaa’s “vision for peace.” The irony was suffocating.
Al-Sharaa, who once commanded al-Qaeda’s branch in Syria, now leads the very nation he once helped destroy. His journey from fugitive to head of state may astonish the world, but America’s acceptance of him reveals something far more telling. Trump’s government, which once condemned Syria’s militants as the scourge of civilization, now celebrates their leader as an ally. Perfume was sprayed, hands were clasped, and jokes about wives filled the air where solemnity should have stood.
Meanwhile, in the same breath, the same government seeks to strip Zohran Mamdani of his citizenship. They accuse him of deceit, of sympathizing with terrorists, of bringing danger into America’s heart. His only crime is being Muslim and refusing to bow. Born in Uganda, raised in New York, and dedicated to serving its people, Mamdani ran a campaign focused on housing and affordability. For that, he was branded a threat. His opponents called him a “communist,” a “jihadist,” and worse. They moved to bar him from office, claiming he lied on his citizenship papers, though no such proof exists.
To his supporters, Mamdani stands for the very ideals this nation claims to defend. Yet the same leaders who cheer for a man with blood on his hands work tirelessly to silence a man with none. When Mamdani spoke of the cruel normalcy of Islamophobia, he described not just prejudice, but policy. It has become acceptable, even expected, for power in this nation to punish the devout and uplift the dangerous, to vilify the righteous and sanctify the reformed militant.
How easily the American conscience bends when profit, politics, or spectacle call. They will weep for victims of terror while shaking hands with its architects. They will warn of radicalism while applauding those who once preached it. And they will condemn the faithful who dare to lead in peace, because their peace threatens the myth of superiority.
A nation that once vowed to bring terrorists to justice now protects them in the halls of its highest office. The president who vowed to protect America from Islam now embraces a man who once led its enemies in battle. Yet a Muslim mayor, chosen by the people, is told he does not belong.
Such contradictions do not mark strength, but moral decay. A country that rewards violence and punishes virtue stands stripped of its own credibility. This is not the land of freedom it claims to be. It is a land that kneels before its own hypocrisy.
“To be Muslim in New York is to expect indignity. But indignity does not make us distinct; there are many New Yorkers who face it,” Mamdani stated. “It is the tolerance of that indignity that does. No more will New York be a city where you can traffic in Islamophobia and win an election.”
#NNPA BlackPress
OP-ED: The 50-Year Mortgage Is a Trap, not a Path to Black Wealth
BLACKPRESSUSA NEWSWIRE – For Black families already fighting a manufactured wealth gap, this isn’t a path to ownership. It is a debt trap that drains equity, delays retirement, and repeats the same housing discrimination that locked us out generations ago.
By Constance Carter
Wealth Advocate
Einstein called compound interest the eighth wonder of the world. Those who understand it earn it. Those who do not pay it. That is why the Trump administration is floating a 50-year mortgage. They are betting that we will not see the true cost.
He, him, and they are framing this as a path to affordability. But let me show you what it really is.
Let’s look at the math for a $420,000 home at 7 percent interest.
30-year mortgage:
Payment: $2,792 per month
Total interest: $586,332
50-year mortgage:
Payment: $2,527 per month
Total interest: $1,095,029
You save about $265 a month but pay an extra $508,697 in interest.
Half a million dollars.
That’s not a discount. It is a trap. Stretching a loan across five decades hands banks hundreds of thousands of dollars that will never circulate through our families or build our wealth.
The numbers don’t lie.
The median age of a first-time homebuyer in 2025 is 40, according to the National Association of Realtors. If a 40-year-old signs a 50-year mortgage, they will not own their home until they are 90.
Ninety years old.
You will be renting from a bank for half a century. This is not what the 30-year mortgage was designed to do.
When the 30-year mortgage gained popularity in the 1950s, the average home was priced around $7,354, and the typical interest rate was about 4 percent. One income could support a family and pay a mortgage. The mortgage system we are being asked to trust today was never designed with our interests in mind.
From 1934 to the 1960s, the Federal Housing Administration refused to insure mortgages for Black families, calling it an “economically sound” policy. This helped establish the red lines on maps that labeled Black neighborhoods as “too risky.” Even Black veterans who served in World War II were denied access to GI Bill home loans that helped white families build generational wealth.
Black families were just as qualified to buy those affordable homes but were denied access.
White families purchased homes for $7,000 in the 1950s that are now worth $300,000 to $400,000. That appreciation built the white middle class. Black families were locked out by design.
If they move forward with the 50-year mortgage plan, working-class Black families in particular will feel the impact first, depleting the wealth we have accumulated despite all the barriers we’ve faced.
Prices are high. Rates are high. Affordability is at its lowest point in decades. We need two incomes, side hustles, credit stacking, and divine intervention to compete with institutional investors and inflated housing prices.
A 50-year mortgage does not solve this. It expands the burden by creating the illusion of affordability and traps people in a cycle of debt for life.
Think about retirement.
The average Social Security check is about $1,900 a month. Even if the program still exists in its current form by the time today’s buyers reach retirement age, how will they manage a $2,500 to $3,000 mortgage and still afford food, medicine, and basic living costs?
A 50-year mortgage pushes Black homeowners into a future where retirement is impossible, which is its own form of bondage. Bondage is debt you cannot escape. Bondage is owing a bank money until the day you die.
The data on Black wealth is already alarming. A report from Prosperity Now and the Institute for Policy Studies predicts that by 2053, the median wealth of Black Americans will fall to zero if trends do not change. A 50-year mortgage moves us closer to that outcome.
The legacy of housing discrimination still shapes today’s wealth divide. What we need is access, not more years added to a loan.
The real solutions are clear:
- Affordable housing construction.
- Lower interest rates.
- Higher wages.
- Down payment assistance.
- Regulation on hedge funds buying entire neighborhoods.
- Stronger consumer protections against products disguised as opportunities.
A 50-year mortgage solves none of this. It solves one thing for banks. Profit.
Family, do not make decisions today that will bankrupt your future. Before you sign a 50-year mortgage, ask yourself:
Will I still be paying this when I am supposed to be retired?
Will this help me build equity or delay it?
Will this protect or drain my family’s wealth?
A mortgage should be a path to ownership.
We cannot build generational wealth on a foundation of generational debt.
-
Activism3 weeks agoOakland School Board Proposes Budget Solutions to Avoid State or County Takeover
-
Activism4 weeks agoOakland Post: Week of October 15 – 21, 2025
-
Alameda County4 weeks agoOPINION: Argent Materials Oakland CleanTech Community Asset Helps Those In Need
-
Alameda County3 weeks agoPort of Oakland September Cargo Volumes Dip Amid Shifting Trade Patterns
-
Activism3 weeks agoA Call to Save Liberty Hall: Oakland’s Beacon of Black Heritage Faces an Uncertain Future
-
Activism3 weeks agoPrescribing Prevention: Doctors Turn to Lifestyle, Herbs and Veggies to Protect Against Chronic Illness in Black Californians
-
Activism3 weeks agoOakland Post: Week of October 22 – 28, 2025
-
Alameda County3 weeks agoMayor Lee Responds to OPD Chief Floyd Mitchell’s Decision to Resign






