Connect with us

Community

After Worker Strike Threat, East Bay Regional Park District Raises Wages

Parks workers announced their win during a press conference on Tuesday at noon. Melissa Fowlks stressed the cooperative nature of their labor struggle.

Published

on

East Bay Parks Workers (from left to right) Chris Newey, Erdem Durgunoğlu, Mary Brown, Sergio Huerta, Anja Brey and Ross Mitchell stand in Tilden Park on May 19. Photo courtesy of People for East Bay Parks Workers.

Following threats of a worker strike over Labor Day weekend, around 600 workers with the East Bay Regional Park District came to a tentative agreement with the district’s board and management on August 31 that raises salaries, putting all workers at or just above median wages for similar jobs in the region.

“I’m feeling not only elated and exhilarated but also really tired,” said Sergio Huerta, a park supervisor and firefighter who has worked with the district for over 30 years. “I’m really proud of the work that we’ve all done.”

Starting about eight months ago, workers had been negotiating with the district through their union, AFSCME 2428, to raise salaries. Huerta said the struggle was hard and long, adding 12-16 extra hours to his work week. During a press conference on Tuesday, district naturalist Melissa Fowlks said “getting to fair, equitable compensation has been a mountain of a struggle.” But, Park workers felt they had much to gain, because their previous contract had them making a lower salary than they felt was fair.

“I love my job, but I don’t want to have to choose between my job and providing for my family,” said Pia Loft in an interview with The Oakland Post several days before workers announced their win. “I want respect and I want fair pay.”

Loft is an educator with the district who is raising two children.

While parks workers fulfill a vast array of jobs to maintain and improve the park and its community including education, firefighting, life guarding, and accounting, almost all park workers take home a lower salary than those doing similar jobs in the area.

According to a report Ralph Andersen & Associates released in 2019 that analyzed the salaries of 37 different park positions, 34 of these positions make less than the median salary for similar jobs in the region and seven make over 20% less than the regional median salary. On average, parks workers make 10% less than the median regional income.

Workers say the low salaries cause people to leave the district, which has resulted in vacancies in over 40 positions. Loft said if these positions were filled, visitors would likely see an improvement in park services including cleaner bathrooms, visitor centers that are open more consistently, and more educational and volunteer opportunities.

Huerta continues to hear stories about workers leaving the district because of salaries lower than those who work nearby. On average, a firefighter with the district makes about $40 an hour, but elsewhere in the region, firefighters make about $44 an hour. Rangers with the district make about $34 an hour, while rangers in other parts of the region make about $36 an hour. Those in senior admin positions with the district make about $36 an hour but would make about $41 an hour working the same job elsewhere in the region. One of Huerta’s close friends recently told him he is leaving the district for a better paying job.

“It hurts because these are really good people who are dedicated to their work,” he said.

But the workers’ recent win will improve salaries, which they hope will lead to vacancies being filled. The new contract, which will go into effect the first week of November, will bring all salaries to at least the regional median rate.

Workers also secured retroactive pay, although not as much as they hoped they would. While workers had initially asked to receive back pay which amounted to the median regional salary since their previous contract expired on April 1, they negotiated back pay to 3% of their salaries since that date.

The East Bay Regional Park District covers both Alameda and Contra Costa counties, and members of these communities showed support to the workers during their struggle for higher pay. Over 5,000 people wrote e-mails to the parks board in support of the workers.

“Don’t try to shortchange the workers!” wrote Oakland resident Miguel Duarte.

Starting on August 20, workers announced they might strike on Labor Day weekend if their demands for median regional pay were not met.

Facing the threat of a strike that had broad support from the surrounding community, the parks board scheduled a special meeting on Thursday, August 26. At the meeting, which took place on Zoom, around 250 workers showed up and over 50 spoke out against what they saw as unfair pay.

Some spoke of excess funds the board had that could be used to pay workers. Their union, AFCME 2428, has pointed out that the district’s mid-year report from this year shows over $140 million in cash reserves and investment holdings as well as a $26 million budget surplus in 2020. Workers claimed to feel disrespected by their less than median wages while they saw funds were available to pay them better.

“It is disheartening to know that our well-being is an afterthought,” said parks worker Justin Irwin at the meeting. “I work multiple jobs to support myself and my family.”

Community members also showed up. Oakland resident E Connor told the board that “Oakland is a union town” and the community would support a strike.

During the meeting the district board and management listened to speakers but did not respond. At the end of the meeting board president Dee Rosario thanked the speakers and said, “Your board has heard your stories, and now it is the board’s turn to go to work.”

The day after the meeting, on the morning of August 27, The Oakland Post e-mailed both Rosario and the district’s general manager Sabrina Landreth questions about employee pay, vacancies, and the budget surplus. Neither Rosario nor Landreth responded to the questions.

On Monday, the district’s executive director, Carol Johnson, responded on behalf of Landreth. She also did not answer the questions posed but wrote that after working on “a few remaining issues” the district and AFCME 2428 were close to an agreement that would avoid a strike.

Parks workers announced their win during a press conference on Tuesday at noon. Melissa Fowlks stressed the cooperative nature of their labor struggle.

“No one person alone could make this happen,” she said. “We did this collectively as a group and everyone pulled their weight.”

The Oakland Post’s coverage of local news in Alameda County is supported by the Ethnic Media Sustainability Initiative, a program created by California Black Media and Ethnic Media Services to support community newspapers across California.

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of January 8 – 14, 2025

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of January 8 – 14, 2025

Published

on

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Continue Reading

#NNPA BlackPress

Supreme Court Decision Confirms Convicted Felon Will Assume Presidency

NNPA NEWSWIRE — In a 5-4 ruling, the court stated that Trump’s concerns could “be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal” and emphasized that the burden of sentencing was “relatively insubstantial” given that Trump will not face prison time. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court’s three liberal justices in the majority, with four conservative justices dissenting.

Published

on

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior National Correspondent
@StacyBrownMedia

The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s emergency request to block criminal proceedings in his New York hush money case, ensuring that a sentencing hearing will proceed as scheduled on Friday. The decision makes it official that, on January 20, for the first time in its history, the United States will inaugurate a convicted felon as its president.

In a 5-4 ruling, the court stated that Trump’s concerns could “be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal” and emphasized that the burden of sentencing was “relatively insubstantial” given that Trump will not face prison time. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the court’s three liberal justices in the majority, with four conservative justices dissenting.

Trump was convicted in May for falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels before the 2016 election. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg argued that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to intervene in a state criminal case, particularly before all appeals in state courts were exhausted.

Trump’s legal team claimed the sentencing process would interfere with his transition to power and argued that evidence introduced during the trial included official actions protected under the Supreme Court’s prior ruling granting former presidents immunity for official conduct. Merchan, the New York judge who presided over the trial, ruled in December that the evidence presented was unrelated to Trump’s duties as president.

Prosecutors dismissed Trump’s objections, stating that the sentencing would take less than an hour and could be attended virtually. They said the public interest in proceeding to sentencing outweighed the President-elect’s claims of undue burden.

Justice Samuel Alito, one of the four dissenting justices, confirmed speaking to Trump by phone on Wednesday. Alito insisted the conversation did not involve the case, though the call drew criticism given his previous refusals to recuse himself from politically sensitive matters.

The sentencing hearing is set for Friday at 9:30 a.m. in Manhattan. As the nation moves closer to an unprecedented inauguration, questions about the implications of a convicted felon assuming the presidency remain.

“No one is above the law,” Bragg said.

Continue Reading

Activism

Barbara Lee Launches Campaign for Mayor of Oakland

“At this critical moment, we must not be a city divided, but a community united,” she Lee. “If elected I will bring my hands-on leadership, new ideas and decades of experience in identifying billions in resources for our great city, so all residents and businesses are stronger and safer and our community has optimism and confidence in Oakland’s future.”

Published

on

By Post Staff

Barbara Lee on Wednesday morning formally announced her candidacy for Mayor in Oakland’s April 15 special election.

“Time and time again, Oaklanders have faced our toughest obstacles by uniting to meet our challenges,” said Lee.

“At this critical moment, we must not be a city divided but a community united,” she said. “If elected, I will bring my hands-on leadership, new ideas, and decades of experience in identifying billions in resources for our great city so all residents and businesses are stronger and safer and our community has optimism and confidence in Oakland’s future.”

“As Mayor, I’ll address our homelessness crisis, prioritize comprehensive public safety and mental health services, and lead with fiscal responsibility to deliver the core City services residents and business owners deserve. Let’s do this – together.”

“I’ve never shied away from a challenge,” said Lee. “I’m always ready to fight for Oakland.”

Watch her campaign video here, which is online at BarbaraLee4Oakland.com

Continue Reading

Subscribe to receive news and updates from the Oakland Post

* indicates required

CHECK OUT THE LATEST ISSUE OF THE OAKLAND POST

ADVERTISEMENT

WORK FROM HOME

Home-based business with potential monthly income of $10K+ per month. A proven training system and website provided to maximize business effectiveness. Perfect job to earn side and primary income. Contact Lynne for more details: Lynne4npusa@gmail.com 800-334-0540

Facebook

Trending

Copyright ©2021 Post News Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.