City Government
New Evidence and Lawsuit Support Brooks’ Self Defense Argument
After months of investigation, the law firm of Siegel, Yee & Brunner filed a claim on behalf of Oakland City Councilmember Desley Brooks this week against the City Attorney’s office of Oakland alleging that City Attorney Barbara Parker and her staff failed to competently represent Brooks in a lawsuit brought against her and the City by Elaine Brown, a former Black Panther chairwoman.
Barbara Parker, the City Attorney, represented Brooks in a civil trial that concluded in March 2018. The City lost the case and ultimately had to pay a $1.2 million fine and $1 million in legal fees. Brooks was required to pay $75,000.
This is not the only trial Parker and her team have lost. A recent investigation by the East Bay Express found that Parkers’ office lost or settled cases that have cost the City $26,478,638 in approximately 117 lawsuits against the City, not including a recent $12 million judgment in a recent police incident.

City Attorney Barbara Parker
“It is clear that City Attorney Parker and her staff have failed to perform their duties and that change is needed,” said Dan Siegel, lead attorney of the firm Siegel, Yee & Brunner in Oakland. Siegel told the Post that he conducted research, interviews and “went through the entire record of the (Brooks vs. Brown) trial—the transcript and the documents that each side filed.”
“The job done by the City Attorney’s office was clearly inadequate…and led to the result that we saw,” he said.
“Our findings make the case that City Attorney Barbara Parker and her staff, through a pattern of negligence, poor preparation, and/or lack of competence, caused an unjustified award of significant money damages against the City of Oakland and grave harm to her reputation and emotional stress to Desley Brooks, councilmember and client of the City Attorney’s office,” said Siegel in a media release.
The case of Elaine Brown v. City of Oakland and Desley Brooks was based on an incident that took place between Brooks and Brown on Oct. 30, 2015 at an Oakland restaurant in Jack London Square. The jury found that Brooks had assaulted Brown by pushing her to the floor.
Elaine Brown is a former Black Panther and currently a nonprofit real estate developer.
However, this claim alleges that the jurors could have come to a different conclusion had City Attorney Parker conducted a stronger case.
The record shows, according to the claim, that the performance of City Attorney Barbara Parker’s staff led to the verdicts against the City of Oakland and Brooks, through “professional negligence, repeated failure to object to improper evidence, and inability to present a strong case.”
According to the claim, evidence shows that:
- “Brooks acted in reasonable self-defense to protect herself from Elaine Brown.”
- “Brown’s history of threats and violence demonstrated that she was the aggressor in the physical confrontation with Brooks.”
- “Brown’s (action) in retrieving a weapon from her car to continue the confrontation with Brooks shows she was not injured.”
- Complete medical evidence was not admitted.
Brooks in an April 25, 2016 statement said that Brown “poked her several times in the chest” “before Brooks pushed Brown away, resulting in her falling over and injuring herself.
Brooks’ statements were corroborated by the testimony of another eyewitness, the claim said.
Attorneys for the City also failed to present evidence of Brown’s use of alcohol on the date of the incident or evidence of the “threatening and abuse language she used against Ms. Brooks, including a threat by Brown to “kick her ‘m** f** ass,’” according to the claim.
Further, the claim said that Brown “went to her car to get a pipe after Ms. Brooks pushed her, saying “I’m going to get that b***.”
Contacted by the Post, Alex Katz, spokesman for City Attorney Parker, replied in an emailed statement.
“Frankly, we are very surprised to receive this claim from Desley Brooks given this office’s professional and diligent defense in this case,” he said.
Recently, the City Attorney’s Office also lost the high profile Bulk Terminal Coal case and a major motion in the Ghostship case that could lead to millions of dollars in debt to the City.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of December 31, 2025 – January 6, 2026
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 31, 2025 – January 6, 2026
To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Activism
Oakland Post: Week of December 24 – 30, 2025
The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of – December 24 – 30, 2025
To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.
Alameda County
Oakland Council Expands Citywide Security Cameras Despite Major Opposition
In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”
By Post Staff
The Oakland City Council this week approved a $2.25 million contract with Flock Safety for a mass surveillance network of hundreds of security cameras to track vehicles in the city.
In a 7-1 vote in favor of the contract, with only District 3 Councilmember Carroll Fife voting no, the Council agreed to maintain its existing network of 291 cameras and add 40 new “pan-tilt-zoom cameras.”
In recent weeks hundreds of local residents have spoken against the camera system, raising concerns that data will be shared with immigration authorities and other federal agencies at a time when mass surveillance is growing across the country with little regard for individual rights.
The Flock network, supported by the Oakland Police Department, has the backing of residents and councilmembers who see it as an important tool to protect public safety.
“This system makes the Department more efficient as it allows for information related to disruptive/violent criminal activities to be captured … and allows for precise and focused enforcement,” OPD wrote in its proposal to City Council.
According to OPD, police made 232 arrests using data from Flock cameras between July 2024 and November of this year.
Based on the data, police say they recovered 68 guns, and utilizing the countywide system, they have found 1,100 stolen vehicles.
However, Flock’s cameras cast a wide net. The company’s cameras in Oakland last month captured license plate numbers and other information from about 1.4 million vehicles.
Speaking at Tuesday’s Council meeting, Fife was critical of her colleagues for signing a contract with a company that has been in the national spotlight for sharing data with federal agencies.
Flock’s cameras – which are automated license plate readers – have been used in tracking people who have had abortions, monitoring protesters, and aiding in deportation roundups.
“I don’t know how we get up and have several press conferences talking about how we are supportive of a sanctuary city status but then use a vendor that has been shown to have a direct relationship with (the U.S.) Border Control,” she said. “It doesn’t make sense to me.”
Several councilmembers who voted in favor of the contract said they supported the deal as long as some safeguards were written into the Council’s resolution.
“We’re not aiming for perfection,” said District 1 Councilmember Zac Unger. “This is not Orwellian facial recognition technology — that’s prohibited in Oakland. The road forward here is to add as many amendments as we can.”
Amendments passed by the Council prohibit OPD from sharing camera data with any other agencies for the purpose of “criminalizing reproductive or gender affirming healthcare” or for federal immigration enforcement. California state law also prohibits the sharing of license plate reader data with the federal government, and because Oakland’s sanctuary city status, OPD is not allowed to cooperate with immigration authorities.
A former member of Oakland’s Privacy Advisory Commission has sued OPD, alleging that it has violated its own rules around data sharing.
So far, OPD has shared Flock data with 50 other law enforcement agencies.
-
Bay Area3 weeks agoPost Salon to Discuss Proposal to Bring Costco to Oakland Community meeting to be held at City Hall, Thursday, Dec. 18
-
Activism3 weeks agoMayor Lee, City Leaders Announce $334 Million Bond Sale for Affordable Housing, Roads, Park Renovations, Libraries and Senior Centers
-
Activism4 weeks agoOakland Post: Week of December 10 – 16, 2025
-
Activism3 weeks agoOakland School Board Grapples with Potential $100 Million Shortfall Next Year
-
Arts and Culture3 weeks agoFayeth Gardens Holds 3rd Annual Kwanzaa Celebration at Hayward City Hall on Dec. 28
-
Activism3 weeks ago2025 in Review: Seven Questions for Black Women’s Think Tank Founder Kellie Todd Griffin
-
Advice3 weeks agoCOMMENTARY: If You Don’t Want Your ‘Black Card’ Revoked, Watch What You Bring to Holiday Dinners
-
Activism3 weeks agoAnn Lowe: The Quiet Genius of American Couture





