Activism

SF Company, Oakland Unhoused Residents, End Year Long Land Dispute

Published

4 years ago

November 19, 2020

Kiki

Activists hold shields and stand crouched behind them on Friday, November 13th on a tract of land just west of Wood Street in West Oakland. The shields created a barrier to delay the eviction of unhoused people living in buses. Photo by Zack Haber.

San Francisco’s GameChanger LLC and seven unhoused residents ended a dispute on Monday when residents agreed to leave a 1.5 acre tract of company owned land just west of Wood Street in West Oakland in exchange for accepting material or monetary concessions.

Both sides agreed to each other’s terms after a year-long standoff that involved a court battle, law enforcement actions, several protests and civil disobedience.

Over the last year, the United Front Against Displacement (UFAD), a grassroots group that organizes to prevent displacement, supported the residents during the standoff by organizing several protests and defensive actions.

“We would have been mowed over if it wasn’t for the UFAD…and all the neighbors that came out of their houses to stand by us,” said Mavin Carter-Griffin, a resident in her mid-50s who, starting over seven years ago, lived in trailers and self-built structures that sat partially on the tract of land and partially on the bordering Wood Street. She agreed to move all of her belongings off the tract and onto Wood Street on Monday in exchange for a 40-foot metal storage facility and assurance that the move would be done in a way that would not cause her to lose possessions she wished to keep.

Some roots of the dispute can be traced back to Nov. 5, and 6 of 2019. On those days the City of Oakland, using funds supplied by GameChanger for towing expenses, agreed to clear vehicles off the company’s land. Some of those vehicles were abandoned, while others served as homes for residents, off the company’s land.

At the time, the dust-covered tract with dried grass and wild flowering fennel was densely packed with unhoused residents who lived in vehicles, tents, or self-made structures. The declared plan was for GameChanger to lease their land for $1 a year to the City of Oakland which would then work with a nonprofit to create a Safe RV parking site where residents who lived in RVs could soon come back and live.

An 18-month-long lease was written up, but not signed, as the City first wanted the land cleared. During the operation, Oakland Police Dept. officers also encouraged people living in tents and self-made homes to clear the area, although no formal eviction was declared.

Some residents resisted the move as they did not want to live in a Safe RV Parking site, were skeptical that they would be allowed to return, and/or felt that moving would put them in a less safe position. The UFAD and their supporters worked with the residents by organizing a protest during the operation to support them in their resistance.

Protestors chanted “shame” and “quit your jobs” as OPD officers walked throughout the tract. While the vast majority of residents left the tract during the operation, a small group of unhoused residents remained on the tract, resisting OPD officers who encouraged them to move.

One resident who resisted the eviction and asked only to be identified as Puffy, recalls dogs being involved as well.

“A bunch of people showed up with a bunch of people from the camp,” said Puffy. “And the dogs started barking and these big burly cops didn’t want to [mess] with the people or the dogs. So they left.”

California Secretary of State records show that Fred Craves owns GameChanger LLC and bought the tract in 2016. He also owns Bay City Capital, a life science investment firm that, according to its website, has raised over $1.6 billion.

Craves has not responded to requests to comment on this story but his lawyer, Pat Smith of Smith LLP said by allowing his land to be used for a Safe RV Parking site she thinks “the owner feels he’s being able to do something positive for city and the homeless.”

Smith has stated that GameChangers will develop the land within two to three years and hopes that in the interim time “hopefully the homelessness problem will start to be addressed more successfully but the city.”

In the weeks that followed last November’s clearance, GameChanger installed a fence around their land and hired a security guard, but most of the few remaining residents still did not leave. The City refused to sign a lease with GameChanger until the lot was cleared. Then GameChanger escalated their tactics to remove unhoused residents.

Smith said they sued remaining residents in December 2019, and in September 2020 GameChanger was able to get a forceable detainer trial, which they won, requiring the Alameda County Sheriff to evict residents still on the tract within a 180-day period that started on Oct 13.

The UFAD still wished to defend those living on the land, partially because they were concerned about how the Safe RV Parking site and eventual development on the land would affect those in surrounding areas of a larger sprawling community of unhoused people that live on Wood Street and nearby CalTrans land.

“The tract is right in the center of the community,” said Dayton Andrews of the UFAD. “As this land is developed, it puts more pressure for eviction on the surrounding inhabitants. So after they develop this lot we’re going to see more and more people along the sidewalk get pressured and more and more people on the CalTrans land get pressured.”

The Safe RV parking lot itself could pose a problem to some residents since, if it works like other City-run parking sites, only those who live in RVs would be allowed in. Some residents who live in RVs also do not want to live in such a site.

Kelly Thompson, an elderly resident who lives near the GameChanger tract on CalTrans land left a similar City-sanctioned site after being robbed at gunpoint there earlier this year.

Not knowing when the eviction would occur, UFAD put out a call for people to show up early on October 13 to defend the tract. About 70 people came and sheriff’s deputies did not execute the eviction on that day.

The group and concerned local housed residents then organized an occupation during working hours on weekdays, where a few people took turns keeping an eye out for sheriff’s deputies approaching the tract.

On the afternoon of October 29, sheriff’s deputies came to execute the eviction, and supporters on site made a call for additional people to protest, which inspired about 60 total people to show up. Sheriff’s deputies were able to take residents who where on-site out of the tract but protestors stood at the exit of the gate and locked arms in a standoff with police and chanted “Who protects us? We protect us,” and “The people, united, will never be defeated.”

As sheriff’s deputies and protestors faced off, workers for GameChanger showed up with a truck full of fencing that could have secured the tract further but were unable to get past the line of protestors. Sheriff’s deputies and GameChanger workers left shortly after 5:00 p.m.

There were large holes in GameChanger’s fence and residents came back to the tract later in the night, violating trespassing law.

“Our role was to have unauthorized dwellers leave the property and we turned it over to GameChanger LLC and their reps,” wrote Alameda County Public Sheriff’s Deputy Sgt. Ray Kelly in an e-mail written on Monday. “It is their job to secure lock and clean the location. We are not involved with any fencing or site security.”

To follow California law, GameChanger then had to wait 15 days before removing property from the site. On November 6, exactly a year after the initial 2019 protest, Puffy, who had lived on the tract in a tent and self-made structures for about eight years, moved to land about a quarter mile north under the I-880 Highway, but only after being given an RV.

“The issue with this property, to me it’s between this billionaire, and us. If he’s got a beef let him come and say it,” said unhoused resident Cam McKeel on Sunday while remaining on Gamechanger’s tract.

McKeel, along with four other residents, established a residency on the tract in 2017 and lived in buses situated behind self-built barricading wooded walls that stood about 10 feet tall and a locking gate. A black and red sign attached to the gate read “KEEP OUT.”

Oakland Police Department officers showed up on November 13, and also came on Monday. They were within their legal rights to arrest McNeel and the other people living in buses for trespassing. But no arrests were made.

On both days, activists bearing colorful shields formed a shield wall by holding and slightly overlapping them with each other at the gate entrance while an additional row of supporters stood behind them to support their bodies.

Since sheriff’s deputies had broken the lock on the gate while executing the eviction, the spot, if undefended, could have been an easy entrance. But OPD officers faced the shield wall and did not enter. OPD media has not responded to requests to comment on this story.

“It’s just a piece of plywood” said an activist who participated in the shield wall and asked not to be named out of fear of police retaliation. “But it proved to be very effective. The fact that there is a human body behind them and they’d have to drive through that made it something that was a little bit too bold for officers to want to tear down in the same way they would homeless people’s shelters.”

McNeel, other residents who live in buses, and some activists who participated said shielding off the area forced GameChanger to negotiate.

McNeel and other residents came to an agreement on Monday afternoon with GameChanger to leave the tract after being paid over $2,200 each. About a week prior, they said they were offered a flat fee of $1000 total. The residents said they planned to move onto nearby CalTrans land. They were the last residents to leave, and GameChanger finally achieved its goals of clearing the tract.

While the vast majority of residents living on GameChangers tract of land left during the initial City run clearance in November of 2019, Mavin Carter-Griffin, Puffy,

Cam McNeel and others who lived with him in buses all chose to stay and resist the initial clearance operation. They were all able to stay on the tract for an additional year and receive material or cash concessions when they did leave.

UFAD members said they see the prolonged struggle as a win but are now focused on helping other nearby residents in the area resist further displacement.

City of Oakland spokesperson Karen Boyd wrote in an e-mail on Tuesday that since the land was now cleared, the City signed a lease with GameChanger and is moving forward with the Safe RV Parking site that will open in early 2021.

Recently passed City legislation called The Encampment Management Policy states that encampments that sit within 25 feet of a Safe RV Parking site can be subject to closure.

“The GameChanger battle was the first battle in a series,” said Dayton Andrews. “They’re going to escalate after it’s cleared.”

Kiki

Posts by Kiki | Website

Up Next

Triple-Dog Dare: An Open Letter to Governor Newsom

Don't Miss

New Oakland Mural Will Celebrate Diversity, Support Local Black Artists And Enhance Social Justice Efforts In The Community

Kiki

Click to comment

Activism

Oakland Post: Week of November 20 – 26, 2024

The printed Weekly Edition of the Oakland Post: Week of November 20 – 26, 2024

Published

15 hours ago

November 22, 2024

Oakland Post

To enlarge your view of this issue, use the slider, magnifying glass icon or full page icon in the lower right corner of the browser window.

Oakland Post

Posts by Oakland Post

Activism

An Inside Look into How San Francisco Analyzes Homeless Encampments

Dozens of unhoused people are camped at Sixth and Jesse streets in San Francisco’s South of Market neighborhood. Tents made of tarps and blankets, piles of debris, and people lounging alongside the allies and walls of businesses are seen from all angles. These are some of the city’s hotspots. City crews have cleared encampments there over 30 times in the past year, but unhoused people always return.

Published

3 days ago

November 20, 2024

Oakland Post

Since the ruling of Grants Pass by the US Supreme Court earlier this summer, which allows cities the authority to ban people from camping or sleeping on the streets, San Francisco has been at the head of the conversation to crack down on encampments.

By Magaly Muñoz

These are some of the city’s hotspots. City crews have cleared encampments there over 30 times in the past year, but unhoused people always return.

But it’s normal to have tents set up again within less than 24 hours after an encampment sweep, David Nakanishi, Healthy Streets Operation Center Manager at the Department of Emergency Management, says. Sometimes there’s less people than before but often there is also no change.

“Most of the people that were in the encampments that want to go inside, we’ve gotten the majority of those [into shelter],” Nakanishi says. “Many of the people we encounter now, are those who have various reasons to not accept shelter, and some are already in shelter/housing”.

Where neighboring cities in the Bay Area are clearing encampments a few days a week, San Francisco is sweeping 10 times a week, two per weekday.

David Nakanishi, Healthy Streets Operation Center Manager at the San Francisco Department of Emergency Management, makes a 311 report on an encampment in the Mission District. These reports allow smaller city teams to tackle individual spots where unhoused people frequent. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Considering the controversy that plagues the city around its harsh policies, the Post decided to tag along on a ride with Nakanishi to show us how he decides what encampments make it on the city’s sweep list.

Nakanishi, having over 20 years of experience in homelessness management, drives around the busiest parts of the city almost daily. He’s tasked with arranging a weekly sweeping operation schedule for city teams to engage with unhoused folks to help get them off the streets.

So what exactly is he looking out for when deciding what encampments get swept?

It depends, he says.

Locations like schools, recreational centers, senior centers, or businesses are places he tends to want to address quickly, especially schools. These are the places where the complaints are highest and access to facilities is important for residents.

He says he also takes into account 311 calls and reports made to him by city staff. On the date of publication, over 100 calls and reports were made about encampments around the city, according to San Francisco data.

Makeshift structures built from plywood and tarps are starting to pop up more throughout the city. Certain areas under freeways are not under direct authority from San Francisco, making it harder to sweep these encampments. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Nakanishi made a few 311 reports himself on the ride along, pulling over to take photos and describe the encampments into his 311 app. He says it helps him remember where to possibly sweep next or allows smaller teams in the city to engage quicker with individuals on the streets.

Nakanishi also looks at the state of the encampments. Are there a lot of bulky items, such as furniture, or makeshift structures built out of tarps and plywood, blocking areas of traffic? Is trash beginning to pile up and spill into the streets or sidewalks? Sites that meet this criteria tend to be contenders for encampment sweeps, Nakanishi says.

Street by street, he points out individuals he’s interacted with, describing their conditions, habits, and reasons for denying assistance from the city.

One man on 2nd St and Mission, who rolls around a blue recycling bin and often yells at passing pedestrians, has refused shelter several times, Nakanishi says.

People deny shelter for all kinds of reasons, he says. There’s too many rules to follow, people feel unsafe in congregate or shared shelters, or their behavioral and mental health problems make it hard to get them into proper services.

Inside a tent left by an unhoused man on Stevenson and 14th Street in San Francisco. The area smelled of human waste and leftover alcohol. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Nakanishi references another man on South Van Ness under the freeway, who city outreach have attempted to get into shelter, but his screaming outbursts make it difficult to place him without disturbing other people in the same space. Nakanishi says it might be an issue of the man needing resources like medication to alleviate his distress that causes the screaming, but the city behavioral team is in the process of outreaching him to figure that out.

In October, city outreach teams engaged with 495 unhoused people. 377 of those engaged refused shelter and only 118 accepted placements, according to city data. That number of monthly referrals is consistent throughout the entirety of 2024 so far.

Nakanishi has long advocated for the well-being of unhoused people, he explains. In 2004, he was working with the Department of Public Health and told then-Mayor Gavin Newsom that there needed to be more housing for families. Nakinishi was told it was easier to deal with individuals first and the city “will get there eventually.” 20 years later, family housing is still not as extensive as it could be, and the waiting list to get placements for families is a mile long with over 500 names.

In 2020, he was a Senior Behavioral Health Clinician at a hotel in the city during the pandemic. He says in 2021 he collaborated with DPH to provide vaccines to those staying in the makeshift hotel shelters once those became available.

Nakanishi strips apart a solo tent on Stevenson and 14th Street in San Francisco. He discards items, like tarps and cardboard, so that people cannot reuse them to make another sleeping structure. Photo by Magaly Muñoz.

Despite the constant media attention that city outreach is inhumanely treating homeless people, so much so that it has led to lawsuits against San Francisco from advocates, Nakanishi says not a lot of people are seeing the true conditions of some encampments.

He describes soiled clothing and tents, drenched in urine, and oftentimes rodents or bug infestations in places where people are sleeping. He’s asked homeless advocates- often those who are the most critical about the city’s work- who have shown up to observe the sweeps if those are conditions the city should allow people to be subjected to, but not many have answers for him, Nakanishi says.

The city’s “bag and tag” policy allows city workers to throw away items that are “soiled by infectious materials” such as bodily fluids and waste.

Sweep operations are conducted at 8am and 1pm Monday through Friday. People at the encampments are given 72 hour notice to vacate, but some don’t leave the area until the day of the sweep.

City outreach workers come out the day before and day of to offer resources and shelter to those interested. The Department of Public Works discards any trash that is left over from the sweep and washes down the area.

Nakanishi told the Post that the only time the city takes tents or personal possessions from residents is when folks become physically violent towards workers and police take the items as evidence. Other items taken are bagged and tagged in accordance with city policy.

Stories from local newspapers such as the San Francisco Standard and the Chronicle show instances of SFPD handcuffing residents while their items are thrown in the trash or disposing of personal possessions without reason.

Advocates have long been pushing for a more competent and compassionate process if the city is going to choose to continue sweeping unhouse people.

No matter the lawsuits and constant criticisms from allies, the encampment sweeps are not slowing down, even with the cold weather quickly approaching the coastal city.

Nakanishi says there aren’t a lot of large encampments left in San Francisco so now they do runs of streets in order to stretch out the sweeps as much as possible.

It’s calculated strategies and years of first hand knowledge that make this job work, “It takes dedication to the work, caring for the people and the community, and persistence, patience and sometimes good luck to make the positive changes for the people on the street,” Nakanishi says.